Are mammographic density phenotypes associated with breast cancer treatment response and clinical outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Kanbayti, Ibrahem H. [1 ,2 ]
Rae, William I. D. [2 ]
McEntee, Mark E. [2 ,3 ]
Ekpo, Ernest U. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Appl Med Sci, Diagnost Radiog Technol Dept, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Med Radiat Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Brookfield Hlth Sci, Dept Med Roinn Slainte, UG Aras Watson 12, Cork T12 AK54, Ireland
[4] Labs & Res Ctr, Orange Radiol, Calabar, Nigeria
关键词
Mammographic breast density; Breast cancer; Cancer treatment interventions; Patient outcomes; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; TAMOXIFEN TREATMENT; RISK; RECURRENCE; REDUCTION; IMPACT; CLASSIFICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; RALOXIFENE; PREDICTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2019.07.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Mammographic density (MD) increases breast cancer (BC) risk, however, its association with patient outcomes is unclear. We examined the association of baseline MD (BMD), and MD reduction (MDR) following BC treatment with patient outcomes. Six databases (CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Embase) were used to identify relevant articles. The PRISMA strategy was used to extract relevant details. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the "Quality In Prognosis Studies" (QUIPS) tool. A Meta-analysis and pooled risk estimates were performed. Results showed that BMD is associated with contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk (HR = 1.9; 95%CI: 1.3-3.0, p = 0.0007), recurrence (HR = 2.0; 95%CI: 1.0-4.0, p = 0.04), and mortality (HR =1.4; 95%CI: 1.1-1.9, p = 0.003). No association was found between BMD and prognosis (HR = 3.2; 95%CI: 0.9-11.2, p = 0.06). Data on risk estimates (95% CI) from BMD for survival [RR: 1.75; 0.99-3.1 to 2.4; 1.4-4.1], ipsilateral BC [HR: 1; 0.6-1.6 to 3; 1.2-7.5], and treatment response (OR, 1.8; 0.98-3.3) are limited. MDR showed no association with mortality (HR = 0.5; 95%CI: 0.2-1.2, p = 0.13). MDR is associated with a reduced risk of recurrence [HR/RR: 0.35; 0.17-0.68 to 1.33; 0.67-2.65)], however data on MDR and outcomes such as mortality [HR/RR: 0.5; 0.27 -0.93 to 0.59; 0.22-0.88], and CBC risk [RR/HR: 0.53; 0.24-0.84 to 1.3; 0.6-2.7] are limited. Evidence, although sparse, demonstrates that high BMD is associated with an increased risk of recurrence, CBC, and mortality. Conversely, MDR is associated with a reduced risk of BC recurrence, CBC, and BC-related mortality. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 76
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Obstetrical outcomes in women with history of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Valentina D’Ambrosio
    Flaminia Vena
    Daniele Di Mascio
    Ida Faralli
    Lucia Musacchio
    Chiara Boccherini
    Roberto Brunelli
    Maria Grazia Piccioni
    Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
    Antonella Giancotti
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 178 : 485 - 492
  • [42] The relationship between cancer associated fibroblasts biomarkers and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cui, Meimei
    Dong, Hao
    Duan, Wanli
    Wang, Xuejie
    Liu, Yongping
    Shi, Lihong
    Zhang, Baogang
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [43] PIK3CA mutations and their response to neoadjuvant treatment in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan, Hongwei
    Li, Chao
    Xiang, Qian
    Xu, Ling
    Zhang, Zhuo
    Liu, Qianxin
    Zhang, Tonttong
    Zhou, Ying
    Zhao, Xia
    Cui, Yimin
    THORACIC CANCER, 2018, 9 (05) : 571 - 579
  • [44] Biomarkers predictive of a response to extended endocrine therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Woolpert, Kirsten M.
    Ahern, Thomas P.
    Lash, Timothy L.
    O'Malley, Donna L.
    Stokes, Alice M.
    Cronin-Fenton, Deirdre P.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 203 (03) : 407 - 417
  • [45] Are Clinical Outcomes Associated With Medication Regimen Complexity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Alves-Conceicao, Vanessa
    Santos Rocha, Kerilin Stancine
    Nascimento Silva, Fernanda Vilanova
    Santos Silva, Rafaella de Oliveira
    Cerqueira-Santos, Sabrina
    Prado Nunes, Marco Antonio
    Saquete Martins-Filho, Paulo Ricardo
    da Silva, Daniel Tenorio
    de Lyra, Divaldo Pereira, Jr.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2020, 54 (04) : 301 - 313
  • [46] The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carlson, Josh J.
    Roth, Joshua A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 141 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [47] Factors associated with bone metastasis in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Huanmei
    Zhang, Xinxin
    Zhang, Shuguang
    Wang, Xue
    Yu, Shengji
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (04) : 4435 - 4452
  • [48] Clinical application of axillary reverse mapping in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wijaya, Wilson A.
    Peng, Jing
    He, Yinhai
    Chen, Junjie
    Cen, Ying
    BREAST, 2020, 53 : 189 - 200
  • [49] Psychoeducation for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Setyowibowo, Hari
    Yudiana, Whisnu
    Hunfeld, Joke A. M.
    Iskandarsyah, Aulia
    Passchier, Jan
    Arzomand, Homra
    Sadarjoen, Sawitri S.
    de Vries, Ralph
    Sijbrandij, Marit
    BREAST, 2022, 62 : 36 - 51
  • [50] Metformin as an adjuvant treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Coyle, C.
    Cafferty, F. H.
    Vale, C.
    Langley, R. E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (12) : 2184 - 2195