Detection of ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer on cytological specimens using immunocytochemistry

被引:28
|
作者
Vlajnic, Tatjana [1 ]
Savic, Spasenija [1 ]
Barascud, Audrey [1 ]
Baschiera, Betty [1 ]
Bihl, Michel [1 ]
Grilli, Bruno [1 ]
Herzog, Michelle [1 ]
Rebetez, Julien [1 ]
Bubendorf, Lukas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Inst Pathol, Schoenbeinstr 40, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
cytology; immunocytochemistry; lung cancer; predictive marker; ROS1; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; ROS1; REARRANGEMENTS; GENE REARRANGEMENTS; ALK; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; CRIZOTINIB; CHEMOTHERAPY; ACCURACY; FUSIONS;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21983
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDRearrangements of the ROS1 oncogene are found in 1% to 2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and are regarded as mutually exclusive oncogenic driver mutations. Since the approval of targeted therapy for ROS1-positive NSCLC, ROS1 testing has become a part of the diagnostic routine. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), optionally selected for by immunohistochemistry on histological material, is a common practice for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements. However, NSCLC often is diagnosed by cytology alone, requiring predictive marker testing on cytological specimens. In the current study, the authors explored the accuracy of ROS1 immunocytochemistry (ICC) on non-cell block cytological specimens for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements. METHODSICC using the D4D6 antibody on an automated immunostainer was performed prospectively in the routine diagnostic setting on cytological specimens from 295 patients with NSCLC, including adenocarcinoma (241 patients), NSCLC not otherwise specified (50 patients), and other malignancies (4 patients). Any immunostaining was considered positive. RESULTSICC was positive in all 13 ROS1-rearranged NSCLC cases confirmed by FISH (12 cases) or next-generation sequencing (1 case). Confirmation of 282 ICC-negative cases was available for 208 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for ROS1 ICC compared with the final ROS1 status all were 100%. CONCLUSIONSROS1 ICC is an accurate method for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements in NSCLC. Given the high costs and technical challenges of FISH and the rarity of ROS1 rearrangements, ICC is rapid and therefore well suited as a screening method. Cases with equivocal or positive findings on ICC can be confirmed by FISH or molecular tests. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:421-9. (c) 2018 American Cancer Society. ROS1 oncogene rearrangement is a rare but therapeutically targetable alteration in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. In the current study, the authors demonstrate that ROS1 immunocytochemistry on non-cell block cytological specimens is a rapid and highly accurate method for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 429
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical significance of ROS1 5′ deletions in non-small cell lung cancer
    Capizzi, Elisa
    Dall'Olio, Filippo Gustavo
    Gruppioni, Elisa
    Sperandi, Francesca
    Altimari, Annalisa
    Giunchi, Francesca
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Ardizzoni, Andrea
    LUNG CANCER, 2019, 135 : 88 - 91
  • [42] Clinical activity of brigatinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer
    Dudnik, E.
    Agbarya, A.
    Grinberg, R.
    Cyjon, A.
    Bar, J.
    Moskovitz, M.
    Peled, N.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 (12): : 2303 - 2311
  • [43] Oncogene addiction in non-small cell lung cancer: Focus on ROS1 inhibition
    Facchinetti, Francesco
    Rossi, Giulio
    Bria, Emilio
    Soria, Jean-Charles
    Besse, Benjamin
    Minari, Roberta
    Friboulet, Luc
    Tiseo, Marcello
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 55 : 83 - 95
  • [44] Prevalence of ROS1 fusion in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Zhang, Qing
    Wu, Chunyan
    Ding, Wei
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Qiu, Xueshan
    Mu, Dianbin
    Zhang, Haiqing
    Xi, Yanfeng
    Zhou, Jianhua
    Ma, Liheng
    Fu, Shijun
    Gao, Min
    Wang, Bo
    Deng, Juan
    Lin, Dongmei
    Zhang, Jie
    THORACIC CANCER, 2019, 10 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [45] Entrectinib resistance mechanisms in ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer
    Ku, Bo Mi
    Bae, Yeon Hee
    Lee, Kyoung Young
    Sun, Jong-Mu
    Lee, Se-Hoon
    Ahn, Jin Seok
    Park, Keunchil
    Ahn, Myung-Ju
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2020, 38 (02) : 360 - 368
  • [46] Real-world studies of crizotinib in patients with ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: experience from China
    Zhong, Hua
    Lu, Jun
    Wang, Mengzhao
    Han, Baohui
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2025, 14 (02)
  • [47] Resistance mechanisms and potent-targeted therapies of ROS1-positive lung cancer
    Roys, Annie
    Chang, Xing
    Liu, Yang
    Xu, Xiaobo
    Wu, Yingliang
    Zuo, Daiying
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 84 (04) : 679 - 688
  • [48] Matching-adjusted indirect comparison: entrectinib versus crizotinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer
    Chu, Paula
    Antoniou, Miranta
    Bhutani, Mohit K.
    Aziez, Amine
    Daigl, Monica
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (12) : 861 - 876
  • [49] PD-L1 Testing in Cytological Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens: A Comparison with Biopsies and Review of the Literature
    Mansour, Mohammed S. I.
    Lindquist, Kajsa Ericson
    Seidal, Tomas
    Mager, Ulrich
    Mohlin, Rikard
    Tran, Lena
    Hejny, Kim
    Holmgren, Benjamin
    Violidaki, Despoina
    Dobra, Katalin
    Dejmek, Annika
    Planck, Maria
    Brunnstrom, Hans
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2021, 65 (06) : 501 - 509
  • [50] Treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: update and perspectives
    Ryser, Christoph Oliver
    Diebold, Joachim
    Gautschi, Oliver
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 31 (01) : 8 - 12