Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: The Rush Experience

被引:62
|
作者
Erickson, Brandon J. [1 ]
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. [1 ]
Cohen, Mark S. [1 ]
Bush-Joseph, Charles A. [1 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
Nicholson, Gregory P. [1 ]
Romeo, Anthony A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Midwest Orthopaed Rush, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2016年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR); Tommy John; elbow; pitcher; baseball; injury; surgical treatment; LEAGUE BASEBALL PITCHERS; TOMMY JOHN SURGERY; DOCKING TECHNIQUE; ELBOW; FIXATION; PERFORMANCE; PLAYERS; INJURY; RETURN;
D O I
10.1177/2325967115626876
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a common surgery performed in professional, collegiate, and high school athletes. Purpose: To report patient demographics, surgical techniques, and outcomes of all UCLRs performed at a single institution from 2004 to 2014. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients who underwent UCLR from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, at a single institution were identified. Charts were reviewed to determine patient age, sex, date of surgery, sport played, athletic level, surgical technique, graft type, and complications. Data were collected prospectively, and patients were contacted via phone calls to obtain the return-to-sport rate, Conway-Jobe score, Andrews-Timmerman score, and Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) Shoulder and Elbow score. Continuous variable data were reported as weighted means, and categorical variable data were reported as frequencies with percentages. Results: A total of 187 patients (188 elbows) underwent UCLR during the study period (92% male; mean age, 19.6 4.7 years; 78.2% right elbows). There were 165 baseball players (87.8% of all patients), 155 of whom were pitchers (82.5% of all patients). Ninety-seven (51.6%) were college athletes, 68 (36.2%) high school athletes, and 7 (3.7%) professional athletes at the time of surgery. The docking technique was used in 110 (58.5%) patients while the double-docking technique was used in 78 (41.5%). An ipsilateral palmaris longus graft was used in 110 (58.5%) patients while a hamstring autograft was used in 48 (25.5%) patients. The ulnar nerve was subcutaneously transposed in 79 (42%) patients. Clinical follow-up data were available on 85 patients. Mean follow-up was 60 +/- 30.8 months. Overall, 94.1% of patients were able to return to sport and had a Conway-Jobe score of good/excellent while 4.3% had a score of fair. The mean KJOC score was 90.4 +/- 6.7 and mean Andrews-Timmerman score was 92.5 +/- 7.1. Subsequent surgeries were performed in 5.3% of patients. Conclusion: UCLR was performed most commonly on collegiate athletes using an ipsilateral palmaris longus graft. Overall, 94.1% of patients who underwent UCLR were able to return to sport with a mean KJOC score of 90.4 and Andrews-Timmerman Score of 92.5.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Disproportionate trends in ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: projections through 2025 and a literature review
    Mahure, Siddharth A.
    Mollon, Brent
    Shamah, Steven D.
    Kwon, Young W.
    Rokito, Andrew S.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (06) : 1005 - 1012
  • [22] A qualitative assessment of return to sport following ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in baseball players
    Mehta, Mitesh P.
    Tjong, Vehniah K.
    Peterson, Joshua G.
    Christian, Robert A.
    Gryzlo, Stephen M.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 21 : 258 - 264
  • [23] Inconsistencies in reporting risk factors for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction failure: a systematic review
    Berk, Alexander N.
    Rao, Allison J.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    Trofa, David P.
    Connor, Patrick M.
    Piasecki, Dana P.
    Fleischli, James E.
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (07) : 1534 - 1544
  • [24] Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation
    Itami, Yasuo
    Mihata, Teruhisa
    McGarry, Michelle H.
    Lin, Charles C.
    Patel, Nilay A.
    Kantor, Adam H.
    Hasegawa, Akihiko
    Neo, Masashi
    Lee, Thay Q.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (07) : 1477 - 1486
  • [25] Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) Reconstruction With Proximal Single-Tunnel Suspensory Fixation
    Fossum, Bradley W.
    Vopat, Matthew L.
    Brown, Justin R.
    Comfort, Spencer M.
    Su, Charles A.
    Viola, Randall W.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2023, 12 (06): : e997 - e1002
  • [26] Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Overhead Athletes
    Chang, Edward S.
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (03) : 135 - 149
  • [27] Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation
    Narvaez, Michael, V
    Nelson, Trevor J.
    Youssefzadeh, Keon
    Limpisvasti, Orr
    Metzger, Melodie F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (09) : 2508 - 2514
  • [28] Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: Surgical Indications and Reconstruction Technique
    Fu, Michael C.
    Camp, Christopher L.
    Aitchek, David W.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 25 (04) : 310 - 314
  • [29] Medial Elbow Pain During the Return-to-Throwing Period After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Pitchers
    Keller, Robert A.
    Marshall, Nathan E.
    Limpisvasti, Orr
    DeGiacomo, Anthony F.
    Banffy, Michael
    ElAttrache, Neal S.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (11):
  • [30] Sonographic Assessment of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Distal Ulnar Attachment
    Farrow, Lutul D.
    Mahoney, Andrew P.
    Sheppard, Joseph E.
    Schickendantz, Mark S.
    Taljanovic, Mihra S.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (08) : 1485 - 1490