Characterization of cylindrical ionization chambers for patient specific IMRT QA

被引:17
作者
Fraser, Danielle [1 ]
Parker, William [2 ]
Seuntjens, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Med Phys Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Dept Med Phys, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2009年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
dosimetry; quality assurance; intensity modulation; ionization chamber; REFERENCE DOSIMETRY; PLANNING SYSTEM; ION-CHAMBER; 6; MV; BEAMS; VERIFICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCURACY; IMPACT; PHOTON;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.2923
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Proven conventional dosimetry techniques do not provide accuracy and precision in the measurement of inverse planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields. Dynamic and step-and-shoot multileaf collimation (DMLC/SMLC) challenge current ionization chamber dosimetry practices. Ionization chamber performance in these fields is evaluated for three cylindrical chambers of varying volumes (PinPoint (PP): 0.015 cm(3), IC10: 0.13 cm(3), Farmer type NE2571 (FT): 0.69 cm(3)) in terms of measurement reproducibility, dose measurement linearity, and IMRT dose measurements. Fifty IMRT patient specific quality assurance dose measurements were performed with each chamber. DMLC measurements are compared between chambers, and to dose calculations from a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) that used a finite size pencil-beam model (FSPB). Ten SMLC measurements are compared to Monte Carlo simulations available in the TPS. The three chambers demonstrated adequate measurement reproducibility characteristics for both open and DMLC fields, with each chamber able to perform within 2% (2SD) for DMLC fields. Both smaller volume chambers over responded (> 5%) when irradiated with a small number of monitor units in open fields. FT and IC10 chambers demonstrated dose linearity in DMLC fields down to 10 monitor units, while dose linearity for the PP chamber broke down at 100 monitor units. The evaluation of 50 DMLC treatment plan quality assurance procedures revealed that the FT chamber measurements were closest to the FSPB calculated values (FSPB: 1.0, FT: 0.973 +/- 0.044, IC10: 0.963 +/- 0.048, PP: 0.944 +/- 0.071). Quality assurance plans calculated independently with Monte Carlo more closely matched chamber measurements (FSPB: 1.0, MC: 0.97, FT: 0.95). Measurements of absorbed dose to water in IMRT fields are highly chamber and IMRT plan dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 251
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields
    Alfonso, R.
    Andreo, P.
    Capote, R.
    Huq, M. Saiful
    Kilby, W.
    Kjaell, P.
    Mackie, T. R.
    Palmans, H.
    Rosser, K.
    Seuntjens, J.
    Ullrich, W.
    Vatnitsky, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (11) : 5179 - 5186
  • [2] AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams
    Almond, PR
    Biggs, PJ
    Coursey, BM
    Hanson, WF
    Huq, MS
    Nath, R
    Rogers, DWO
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) : 1847 - 1870
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1976, ICRU Report 24
  • [4] The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose
    Arnfield, MR
    Siantar, CH
    Siebers, J
    Garmon, P
    Cox, L
    Mohan, R
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) : 1266 - 1274
  • [5] Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams
    Bouchard, H
    Seuntjens, J
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (09) : 2454 - 2465
  • [6] IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system
    Boudreau, C
    Heath, E
    Seuntjens, J
    Ballivy, O
    Parker, W
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05) : 879 - 890
  • [7] Statistical process control for IMRT dosimetric verification
    Breen, Stephen L.
    Moseley, Douglas J.
    Zhang, Beibei
    Sharpe, Michael B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (10) : 4417 - 4425
  • [8] Dosimetric evaluation of the clinical implementation of the first commercial IMRT Monte Carlo treatment planning system at 6 MV
    Heath, E
    Seuntjens, J
    Sheikh-Bagheri, D
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) : 2771 - 2779
  • [9] COMPREHENSIVE QA FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY - REPORT OF AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK-GROUP-40
    KUTCHER, GJ
    COIA, L
    GILLIN, M
    HANSON, WF
    LEIBEL, S
    MORTON, RJ
    PALTA, JR
    PURDY, JA
    REINSTEIN, LE
    SVENSSON, GK
    WELLER, M
    WINGFIELD, L
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (04) : 581 - 618
  • [10] Comparison of ionization chambers of various volumes for IMRT absolute dose verification
    Leybovich, LB
    Sethi, A
    Dogan, N
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (02) : 119 - 123