Blue Light Induces Degradation of the Negative Regulator Phytochrome Interacting Factor 1 to Promote Photomorphogenic Development of Arabidopsis Seedlings

被引:45
作者
Castillon, Alicia
Shen, Hui
Huq, Enamul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Biol Labs 311 A6700, Sect Mol Cell & Dev Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SEED-GERMINATION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; CRYPTOCHROME; RED-LIGHT; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHOTORECEPTOR; EXPRESSION; OPTIMIZE; DOMAINS; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1534/genetics.108.099887
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Phytochrome interacting factors (PIFs) are nuclear basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors that negatively regulate photomorphogenesis both in the dark and in the light in Arabidopsis. The phytochrome (phy) family of photoreceptors induces the rapid phosphorylation and degradation of PIFs in response to both red and far-red light conditions to promote photomorphogenesis. Although phys have been shown to function under blue light conditions, the roles of PIFs under blue light have not been investigated in detail. Here we show that PIF1 negatively regulates photomorphogenesis at the seedling stage under blue light conditions. pif1 seedlings displayed more open cotyledons and slightly reduced hypocotyl length compared to Wild type under diurnal (12 hr light/12 hr dark) blue light. conditions. Double-mutant analyses demonstrated that pif1phyA, pif1phyB, pif1cry1, and pif1cry2 have enhanced cotyledon opening compared to the single photoreceptor mutants under diurnal blue light conditions. Blue light induced the rapid phosphorylation, polyubiquitination, and degradation of PIF1 through the ubi/26S proteasomal pathway. PIF1 interacted with phyA and phyB in a blue light-dependent manner, and the interactions with phys are necessary for the blue light-induced degradation of PIF1. phyA played a dominant role under pulses of blue light, while phyA, phyB, and phyl) induced the degradation of PIF1 in an additive manner under prolonged continuous blue light conditions. Interestingly, the absence of cry1 and cry2 enhanced the degradation of PIF1 under blue light conditions. Taken together, these data suggest that PIF1 functions as a negative regulator of photomorphogenesis under blue light conditions and that blue light-activated phys induce the degradation of PIF1 through the ubi/26S proteasomal pathway to promote photomorphogenesis.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 171
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] The CRY1 blue light photoreceptor of Arabidopsis interacts with phytochrome A in vitro
    Ahmad, M
    Jarillo, JA
    Smirnova, O
    Cashmore, AR
    [J]. MOLECULAR CELL, 1998, 1 (07) : 939 - 948
  • [2] Photoactivated phytochrome induces rapid PIF3 phosphorylation prior to proteasorne-mediated degradation
    Al-Sady, Bassem
    Ni, Weimin
    Kircher, Stefan
    Schaefer, Eberhard
    Quail, Peter H.
    [J]. MOLECULAR CELL, 2006, 23 (03) : 439 - 446
  • [3] Decoding of light signals by plant phytochromes and their interacting proteins
    Bae, Gabyong
    Choi, Giltsu
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2008, 59 : 281 - 311
  • [4] Modes of action of phytochromes
    Casal, JJ
    Sánchez, RA
    Botto, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1998, 49 (319) : 127 - 138
  • [5] Casal JJ, 2000, PHOTOCHEM PHOTOBIOL, V71, P1, DOI 10.1562/0031-8655(2000)071<0001:PCPPII>2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] Conditional synergism between cryptochrome 1 and phytochrome B is shown by the analysis of phyA, phyB, and hy4 simple, double, and triple mutants in Arabidopsis
    Casal, JJ
    Mazzella, MA
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 118 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [8] Phytochrome Interacting Factors: central players in phytochrome-mediated light signaling networks
    Castillon, Aftia
    Shen, Hui
    Huq, Enamw
    [J]. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2007, 12 (11) : 514 - 521
  • [9] Light signal transduction in higher plants
    Chen, M
    Chory, J
    Fankhauser, C
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 2004, 38 : 87 - 117
  • [10] Higher plants use LOV to perceive blue light
    Demarsy, Emilie
    Fankhauser, Christian
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2009, 12 (01) : 69 - 74