Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?

被引:71
|
作者
Vogt, Ferdinand [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Steffen [1 ]
Dell'Aquila, Angelo Maria [2 ]
Fischlein, Theodor [1 ]
Santarpino, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Munster, Germany
关键词
Heart valve prosthesis; Pacemaker; Electrophysiology; HEART-FAILURE; TIME; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; MULTICENTER; CARDIOLOGY; DISORDERS; COMMITTEE; STENOSIS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivv330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with sutureless bioprostheses has become an alternative to conventional AVR for patients with intermediate to high operative risk. However, this technique is associated with an increased risk of postoperative conduction disorders. METHODS: We analysed 258 patients who underwent AVR with the Perceval prosthesis from July 2010 to September 2014 at our centre. Electrocardiography were obtained at baseline to record preoperatively the presence of conduction disorders. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative procedures and complications (61 variables) were compared between patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM group) and without (no-PPM group) need for postoperative PPM implantation. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent isolated AVR with the Perceval bioprosthesis, 89 patients had associated surgery and 23 patients underwent redo operations. The mean age was 77.7 +/- 5 years, 139 patients were female (46%) and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 13.2 +/- 11%. At baseline, 8 patients had already an implanted pacemaker. Postoperatively, 27 patients (10.5%) required new PPM implantation due to complete atrioventricular block. On univariate analysis, age (PPM vs no-PPM group: 80 +/- 5 vs 77 +/- 5 years, P = 0.009) and preoperative presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) [overall n = 20 (7.8%); PPM vs no-PPM group: 9 vs 11 (33 vs 4.8%); P < 0.001] were identified as independent predictors of postoperative conduction disorders, but only pre-existing RBBB persisted on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 11.3-C-statistic 0.74, error estimate 0.064, confidence interval 0.672-0.801; P = 0.0002). Among patients undergoing sutureless AVR, the rate of PPM implantation was high. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the data collected made it possible to identify preoperatively a subset of patients undergoing sutureless AVR at higher risk of postoperative atrioventricular block. Additional surgical precautions should be implemented to prevent the occurrence of conduction disorders after sutureless AVR.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 258
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leak rates following sutureless aortic valve operations
    Lazkani, Mohamad
    Yerasi, Charan
    Prakash, Sheena
    Pershad, Ashish
    Fang, Kenith
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2018, 33 (12) : 808 - 817
  • [32] Transesophageal Echocardiographic Assessment of the Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve
    Dalia, Adam A.
    Hunter, Caroline
    Woodward, Elliot
    Dudzinski, David
    Andritsos, Michael
    Essandoh, Michael
    Andrawes, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (06) : 2592 - 2598
  • [33] Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Sutureless versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
    Guner, Yesim
    Cicek, Ayse
    Karacalilar, Mehmet
    Ersoy, Burak
    Kyaruzi, Mugisha
    Onan, Burak
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 37 (03) : 328 - 334
  • [34] Ministernotomy Versus Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement With a Sutureless Bioprosthesis: A Multicenter Study
    Dalen, Magnus
    Biancari, Fausto
    Rubino, Antonino S.
    Santarpino, Giuseppe
    De Praetere, Herbert
    Kasama, Keiichiro
    Juvonen, Tatu
    Deste, Wanda
    Pollari, Francesco
    Meuris, Bart
    Fischlein, Theodor
    Mignosa, Carmelo
    Gatti, Giuseppe
    Pappalardo, Aniello
    Sartipy, Ulrik
    Svenarud, Peter
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 99 (02) : 524 - 530
  • [35] Sutureless aortic valve replacement vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a review of a single center experience
    Santarpino, Giuseppe
    Gregorini, Renato
    Specchia, Luigi
    Albano, Antonio
    Nicoletti, Anna
    Fischlein, Theodor
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2018, 66 (02): : 160 - 162
  • [36] Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Hoyt, Matthew J.
    Hathaway, Jessica
    Palmer, Roseanne
    Beach, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (05) : 1162 - 1166
  • [37] Postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: what is the incidence and are there any predicting factors?
    Bates, Matthew G. D.
    Matthews, Iain G.
    Fazal, Iftikhar A.
    Turley, Andrew J.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 12 (02) : 243 - 253
  • [38] Midterm Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement
    Takagi, Hisato
    Umemoto, Takuya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 117 (03) : 490 - 491
  • [39] Meta-analysis of sutureless technology versus standard aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Qureshi, Saqib H.
    Boulemden, Anas
    Szafranek, Adam
    Vohra, Hunaid
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (02) : 463 - 471
  • [40] A Simple Noninvasive Score for Predicting Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Routh, Jared M.
    Joseph, Lee
    Marthaler, Brodie R.
    Bhave, Prashant
    CIRCULATION, 2015, 132