Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review

被引:1244
|
作者
Ho, William [1 ]
Xu, Xiaowei [1 ]
Dey, Prasanta K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Operat & Informat Management Grp, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
关键词
Supplier evaluation; Supplier selection; Multi-criteria decision making; RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; VENDOR SELECTION; TOTAL-COST; NETWORK PROCESS; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CHAIN DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Supplier evaluation and selection problem has been studied extensively. Various decision making approaches have been proposed to tackle the problem. In contemporary supply chain management, the performance of potential suppliers is evaluated against multiple criteria rather than considering a single factor-cost. This paper reviews the literature of the multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection. Related articles appearing in the international journals from 2000 to 2008 are gathered and analyzed so that the following three questions can be answered: (i) Which approaches were prevalently applied? (ii) Which evaluating criteria were paid more attention to? (iii) Is there any inadequacy of the approaches? Based on the inadequacy, if any, some improvements and possible future work are recommended. This research not only provides evidence that the multi-criteria decision making approaches are better than the traditional cost-based approach, but also aids the researchers and decision makers in applying the approaches effectively. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Yildiz, A.
    Yayla, A. Y.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 26 (02): : 158 - 177
  • [2] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION: A LITERATURE CRITIQUE
    Manucharyan, Hayk
    INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2021, 12 (01): : 329 - 352
  • [3] Comparison and evaluation of multi-criteria supplier selection approaches: A case study
    Alkahtani, Mohammed
    Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman
    Kaid, Husam
    Sonboa, Mohammed
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [4] Applications of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Supplier Selection: A Literature Review
    Otheman, Adawiyah
    Abdullah, Lazim
    Ab Ghani, Ahmad Termimi
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS (ICBE2016), 2016, : 489 - 491
  • [5] A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach for Supplier Selection Under Fuzzy Environment
    Sarwar, Adnan
    Zeng, Ziqiang
    AduAgyapong, Richard
    Nguyen ThiHoaiThuong
    Qadeer, Talat
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 708 - 720
  • [6] A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method
    Boran, Fatih Emre
    Genc, Serkan
    Kurt, Mustafa
    Akay, Diyar
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (08) : 11363 - 11368
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using fuzzy AHP approach
    Yadav, Vinod
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (06) : 1158 - 1174
  • [8] Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection
    Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Turskis, Zenonas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2016, 11 (03) : 358 - 371
  • [9] Review of Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods for Intelligent Supplier Selection
    Akburak, Dilek
    INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS: DIGITAL ACCELERATION AND THE NEW NORMAL, INFUS 2022, VOL 2, 2022, 505 : 655 - 663
  • [10] An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (11) : 2892 - 2909