Ethics versus morality A problematic divide

被引:12
作者
Harper, Sarah J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
ethics; morality; reductionism; roles; DUTY;
D O I
10.1177/0191453709343388
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
I explicate the distinction between ethics and morality in terms of four central contrasts, and argue (1) that moral theories that embrace the implicit divide are both theoretically and practically problematic in their failure to meet certain widely accepted standards of theoretical coherence and in their resulting propensity to generate indeterminable conflicts among norms, and (2) that social roles represent one aspect of the moral life that cannot be understood in terms of this distinction. My suggestion will be that we ought to explore an interpretation of the moral realm according to which all moral attributes are relative to social roles, since a role-centered morality promises a way of overcoming this problematic divide.
引用
收藏
页码:1063 / 1077
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ETHICS MEMORY
[2]   MODERN MORAL-PHILOSOPHY [J].
ANSCOMBE, GEM .
PHILOSOPHY, 1958, 33 (124) :1-19
[3]  
ANTHONY K, 2002, TANNER LECT HUMAN VA, V23, P237
[4]  
BRANDT, CONCEPTS, P387
[5]  
BRANDT RB, 1964, MIND, V73, P374
[6]  
Crisp R., 1997, VIRTUE ETHICS, P4
[7]  
DWORKIN RONALD, 2000, SOVEREIGN VIRTUE, P485
[8]  
FRANKENA W, 1980, THINKING MORALITY, P48
[9]   MOTIVE AND DUTY + KANT,IMMANUEL [J].
GARCIA, JLA .
IDEALISTIC STUDIES, 1990, 20 (03) :230-237
[10]  
Hart H.L.A., 1955, PHILOS REV, V64, P175, DOI DOI 10.2307/2182586