Impact of short-read sequencing on the misassembly of a plant genome

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Peipei [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Fanrui [1 ,2 ]
Moore, Bethany M. [1 ,3 ]
Shiu, Shin-Han [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, DOE Great Lake Bioenergy Res Ctr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Ecol Evolut & Behav Biol Program, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Computat Math Sci & Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Genome misassembly; Read coverage; Machine learning; Solanum lycopersicum; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; DNA; EVOLUTION; SIGNATURES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s12864-021-07397-5
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Availability of plant genome sequences has led to significant advances. However, with few exceptions, the great majority of existing genome assemblies are derived from short read sequencing technologies with highly uneven read coverages indicative of sequencing and assembly issues that could significantly impact any downstream analysis of plant genomes. In tomato for example, 0.6% (5.1Mb) and 9.7% (79.6Mb) of short-read based assembly had significantly higher and lower coverage compared to background, respectively. Results: To understand what the causes may be for such uneven coverage, we first established machine learning models capable of predicting genomic regions with variable coverages and found that high coverage regions tend to have higher simple sequence repeat and tandem gene densities compared to background regions. To determine if the high coverage regions were misassembled, we examined a recently available tomato long-read based assembly and found that 27.8% (1.41Mb) of high coverage regions were potentially misassembled of duplicate sequences, compared to 1.4% in background regions. In addition, using a predictive model that can distinguish correctly and incorrectly assembled high coverage regions, we found that misassembled, high coverage regions tend to be flanked by simple sequence repeats, pseudogenes, and transposon elements. Conclusions: Our study provides insights on the causes of variable coverage regions and a quantitative assessment of factors contributing to plant genome misassembly when using short reads and the generality of these causes and factors should be tested further in other species.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of strand bias in Illumina short-read sequencing data
    Guo, Yan
    Li, Jiang
    Li, Chung-I
    Long, Jirong
    Samuels, David C.
    Shyr, Yu
    BMC GENOMICS, 2012, 13
  • [42] Innovations in Short-Read Sequencing Technologies and Their Applications to Clinical Genomics
    Polonis, Katarzyna
    Blommel, Joseph H.
    Hughes, Andrew E. O.
    Spencer, David
    Thompson, Joseph A.
    Schroeder, Molly C.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2025, 71 (01) : 97 - 108
  • [43] Sequencing by Binding (SBB): increase accuracy of short-read genomes
    Korlach, Jonas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 87 - 87
  • [44] Indel variant analysis of short-read sequencing data with Scalpel
    Han Fang
    Ewa A Bergmann
    Kanika Arora
    Vladimir Vacic
    Michael C Zody
    Ivan Iossifov
    Jason A O'Rawe
    Yiyang Wu
    Laura T Jimenez Barron
    Julie Rosenbaum
    Michael Ronemus
    Yoon-ha Lee
    Zihua Wang
    Esra Dikoglu
    Vaidehi Jobanputra
    Gholson J Lyon
    Michael Wigler
    Michael C Schatz
    Giuseppe Narzisi
    Nature Protocols, 2016, 11 : 2529 - 2548
  • [45] The effect of strand bias in Illumina short-read sequencing data
    Yan Guo
    Jiang Li
    Chung-I Li
    Jirong Long
    David C Samuels
    Yu Shyr
    BMC Genomics, 13
  • [46] Deriving Group A Streptococcus Typing Information from Short-Read Whole-Genome Sequencing Data
    Athey, Taryn B. T.
    Teatero, Sarah
    Li, Aimin
    Marchand-Austin, Alex
    Beall, Bernard W.
    Fittipaldi, Nahuel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (06) : 1871 - 1876
  • [47] Will long-read sequencing technologies replace short-read sequencing technologies in the next 10 years?
    Adewale, Boluwatife A.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [48] Optimal pooling for genome re-sequencing with ultra-high-throughput short-read technologies
    Hajirasouliha, Iman
    Hormozdiari, Fereydoun
    Sahinalp, S. Cenk
    Birol, Inanc
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 24 (13) : I32 - I40
  • [49] Cost-conscious generation of multiplexed short-read DNA libraries for whole-genome sequencing
    Jones, Ashley
    Stanley, David
    Ferguson, Scott
    Schwessinger, Benjamin
    Borevitz, Justin
    Warthmann, Norman
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [50] Expectations and blind spots for structural variation detection from long-read assemblies and short-read genome sequencing technologies
    Zhao, Xuefang
    Collins, Ryan L.
    Lee, Wan-Ping
    Weber, Alexandra M.
    Jun, Yukyung
    Zhu, Qihui
    Weisburd, Ben
    Huang, Yongqing
    Audano, Peter A.
    Wang, Harold
    Walker, Mark
    Lowther, Chelsea
    Fu, Jack
    Consortium, Human Genome Structural Variation
    Gerstein, Mark B.
    Devine, Scott E.
    Marschall, Tobias
    Korbel, Jan O.
    Eichler, Evan E.
    Chaisson, Mark J. P.
    Lee, Charles
    Mills, Ryan E.
    Brand, Harrison
    Talkowski, Michael E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2021, 108 (05) : 919 - 928