Efficacy of Preoperative Piroxicam, Diclofenac, Paracetamol With Tramadol and Placebo Tablets for Relief of Postoperative Pain After the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomised Controlled Trial

被引:3
作者
Shukla, Deepankar [1 ]
Bhola, Nitin D. [1 ]
Bhola, Rajiv D. [2 ]
Nimje, Akshay M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sharad Pawar Dent Coll & Hosp, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Wardha, India
[2] Sharad Pawar Dent Coll & Hosp, Prosthodont, Wardha, India
[3] Narendra Kumar Prasadrao Salve Inst Med Sci & Res, Res, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
关键词
analgesia; nsaids; pain; impacted mandibular third molars; preoperative analgesia; INTRAVENOUS TRAMADOL; MORPHINE; SODIUM; SURGERY; EXTRACTION; INHIBITORS; RECEPTORS; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.26839
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim We aimed to analyze the influence of preoperative piroxicam, diclofenac, paracetamol, tramadol, and placebo tablets as measured in the time required for rescue analgesia for postoperative pain relief after the extraction of impacted mandibular third molar. Materials & methods Forty-four patients who needed extraction of impacted mandibular third molar were arbitrarily categorized into four groups namely, piroxicam, diclofenac, paracetamol with tramadol, and placebo. The test medicine was given one hour preoperatively before the surgical removal. The pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS) scores preoperatively and at the third and 24th hours. The time required for escape analgesia was measured. Results The mean VAS and VRS scores showed significant differences across the groups after 24 hours. The mean score was lowest for the patients taking piroxicam ( 1.30+1.95) and highest for patients taking tramadol + paracetamol (4.50+2.59). As far as escape analgesia is concerned piroxicam group was by far superior. Conclusion The pain scores and the rescue analgesic requirement suggested that piroxicam analgesic significantly reduced pain; moreover, it is a safe as well as an efficacious substitute to the conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for mandibular third molar impactions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Pain and analgesic response after third molar extraction and other postsurgical pain [J].
Barden, J ;
Edwards, JE ;
McQuay, HJ ;
Moore, RA .
PAIN, 2004, 107 (1-2) :86-90
[2]   Mechanism of the antinociceptive effect of paracetamol [J].
Bonnefont, J ;
Courade, JP ;
Alloui, A ;
Eschalier, A .
DRUGS, 2003, 63 :1-4
[3]   Prostanoid receptors: Subtypes and signaling [J].
Breyer, RM ;
Bagdassarian, CK ;
Myers, SA ;
Breyer, MD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 41 :661-690
[4]   INTRAVENOUS DICLOFENAC SODIUM - DOES ITS ADMINISTRATION BEFORE OPERATION SUPPRESS POSTOPERATIVE PAIN [J].
CAMPBELL, WI ;
KENDRICK, R ;
PATTERSON, C .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (09) :763-766
[5]   Acute pain [J].
Carr, DB ;
Goudas, LC .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9169) :2051-2058
[6]   A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of paracetamol, serratiopeptidase, ibuprofen and betamethasone using the dental impaction pain model [J].
Chopra, D. ;
Rehan, H. S. ;
Mehra, P. ;
Kakkar, A. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (04) :350-355
[7]   IS THERE ANY CLINICAL ADVANTAGE OF INCREASING THE PREEMPTIVE DOSE OF MORPHINE OR COMBINING PRE-INCISIONAL WITH POSTOPERATIVE MORPHINE ADMINISTRATION [J].
COLLIS, R ;
BRANDNER, B ;
BROMLEY, LM ;
WOOLF, CJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 (04) :396-399
[8]  
COOPER SA, 1976, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V20, P241
[9]   Cyclooxygenase inhibitors - current status and future prospects [J].
Dannhardt, G ;
Kiefer, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 36 (02) :109-126
[10]   ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MORPHINE ON NOCICEPTIVE NEURONS IN THE RAT DORSAL HORN [J].
DICKENSON, AH ;
SULLIVAN, AF .
PAIN, 1986, 24 (02) :211-222