A note on science, legal research and artificial intelligence

被引：4
作者：
Goltz, Nachshon [1 ]
Dondoli, Giulia [2 ]
机构：
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Waikato, Te Piringa Fac Law, Hamilton, New Zealand
来源：
INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY LAW | 2019年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词：
Science; legal research; artificial intelligence; big data; BIG DATA;
D O I：
10.1080/13600834.2019.1644065
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
This paper discusses the principles of scientific research and in turn review legal research that was done using Artificial Intelligence arguing that it is the tools (Artificial Intelligence) that take center stage while the meaning (legal research) is left back stage. In turn, this kind of research does not adhere to the fundamentals of scientific research nor comply with scientific and industry ethical codes.
引用
收藏
页码：239 / 251
页数：13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Andersen H., 2015, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, STAN. TECH. L. REV.
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, HARVARD BUS REV
[4]  
Asmis Elizabeth, 1984, EPICURUS SCI METHOD, P333
[5]  
Baesens B., 2014, MIS Quarterly, V38, P629
[6]  
Baker Jennifer, 2013, TECHWORLD 0212
[7]   Catching up with Robert Merton Scientific Collectives as Status Groups [J].
Barnes, Barry .
JOURNAL OF CLASSICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2007, 7 (02) :179-192
[8]  
Barnes Barry., 1982, RATIONALITY RELATIVI
[9]  
BARNES SB, 1970, ARCH EUR SOCIOL, V11, P3
[10]  
Bennett Colin J., 2016, EXPLORING BOUNDARIES, P212
12345