Kinetic evaluation of the psychrophylic anaerobic digestion of synthetic domestic sewage using an upflow filter

被引:20
作者
Martin, M. A. [2 ]
De la Rubia, M. A. [1 ]
Martin, A. [2 ]
Borja, R. [1 ]
Montalvo, S. [3 ]
Sanchez, E. [4 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Inst Grasa, Seville 41012, Spain
[2] Univ Cordoba, Fac Ciencias, Dept Quim Inorgan & Ingn Quim, Cordoba 14071, Spain
[3] Univ Santiago Chile, Dept Ingn Quim, Santiago, Chile
[4] CSIC, Ctr Ciencias Medioambientates, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Domestic sewage; Manariotis equation; Plug-flow pattern; Upflow anaerobic filter; Young equation; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; SCREENED DAIRY MANURE; UASB REACTOR; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; PRETREATMENT; PROTEINS; CLIMATES; ZEOLITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.010
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
A study of the anaerobic digestion process of synthetic domestic sewage (total COD: 705 mg/L) was carried Out. The digestion was conducted in an upflow anaerobic filter with corrugated plastic rings as packing media at psychrophilic temperature (15-17 degrees C). For HRTs of between 10.0 and 17.1 h, the total COD removal efficiency was almost constant and independent on the HRT, achieving an average value of around 80%. However, when the HRT decreased from 7.0 to 3.2 h the efficiency diminished from 77% to 65%. This decrease in removal efficiency was parallel to the increase in the VFA/Alkalinity ratio for this HRT range. The flow pattern observed in the reactor studied was intermediate between plug-flow and CSTR systems, although the plug-flow Was predominant. It can also be observed that Young and McCarty's model almost coincided with the CSTR model, when the biodegradable COD was used for fitting tile data. The Manariotis equation allowed a better fit of the experimental data (total COD removal efficiency with influent substrate concentration and HRT) than the Young model. The methane yield coefficient obtained was 0.15 L CH4/g COD consumed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 137
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] Greenhouse gas production: A comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology
    Cakir, FY
    Stenstrom, MK
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (17) : 4197 - 4203
  • [12] Coagulation and precipitation as post-treatment of anaerobically treated primary municipal wastewater
    Diamadopoulos, Evan
    Megalou, Konstantina
    Georgiou, Maria
    Gizgis, Nikolaos
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2007, 79 (02) : 131 - 139
  • [13] Low temperature pre-treatment of domestic sewage in an anaerobic hybrid or an anaerobic filter reactor
    Elmitwalli, TA
    Sklyar, V
    Zeeman, G
    Lettinga, G
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 82 (03) : 233 - 239
  • [14] Fogler H. S, 1999, ELEMENTS CHEM REACTI, V3rd
  • [15] CONVERSION PROCESSES IN ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION
    GUJER, W
    ZEHNDER, AJB
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 15 (8-9) : 127 - 167
  • [16] Harleman D.R., 2001, WATER, V21, P57
  • [17] Technical feasibility of the treatment of domestic wastewater by a CEPS-UASB system
    Kalogo, Y
    Verstraete, W
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 21 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [18] Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions: a review
    Kashyap, DR
    Dadhich, KS
    Sharma, SK
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 87 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [19] TREATMENT OF LOW STRENGTH DOMESTIC WASTEWATER USING THE ANAEROBIC FILTER
    KOBAYASHI, HA
    STENSTROM, MK
    MAH, RA
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 1983, 17 (08) : 903 - 909
  • [20] Lettinga G, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V35, P5, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00222-9