Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect

被引:63
作者
Hirshman, E [1 ]
Fisher, J
Henthorn, T
Arndt, J
Passannante, A
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Hlth Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, Denver, CO USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Anesthesiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
recognition memory; mirror effect; dual-process models; word frequency; midazolam; amnesia; benzodiazepines;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00017-7
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The word-frequency mirror effect (Glanzer & Adams, 1985) is the finding that subjects are more accurate on low frequency words than high frequency words for old and new items in recognition memory. Recently, several theorists (Guttentag Carroll, 1997; Joordens Hockley, 2000; Reder et al., 2000) have proposed dual-process accounts of the word-frequency mirror effect. These accounts hypothesize that the low frequency advantage on old items arises from increased recollection of these items, while the low frequency advantage on new items arises from reduced familiarity of these items. We tested these views using midazolam amnesia. Midazolam is a safe, fast-acting benzodiazepine that produces a dense anterograde amnesia. Based on the hypothesis that midazolarn amnesia should have larger effects on recollection than familiarity, we predicted that: (1) old high frequency words should have an advantage over old low frequency words in a midazolam condition (i.e., the traditional effect should reverse); and (2) the traditional advantage of new low frequency words over new high frequency words should replicate in a midazolam condition. Both predictions of the dual-process approach were confirmed. Additional analyses demonstrated that a single-process signal detection model could not account for the current results and that midazolam amnesia produces a larger effect on recollection processes than on familiarity processes. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 516
页数:18
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]   DIAZEPAM AND MEMORY - SUPPORT FOR A DUPLEX MODEL OF MEMORY [J].
MEWALDT, SP ;
HINRICHS, JV ;
GHONEIM, MM .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1983, 11 (06) :557-564
[52]  
MOHLER H, 1983, ANXIOLYTICS NEUROCHE, P15
[53]   Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework [J].
Mulligan, NW ;
Hirshman, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1997, 23 (02) :280-304
[54]   MIDAZOLAM-INDUCED AMNESIA - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE IMPLICIT EXPLICIT MEMORY DISTINCTION [J].
POLSTER, MR ;
MCCARTHY, RA ;
OSULLIVAN, G ;
GRAY, PA ;
PARK, GR .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1993, 22 (02) :244-265
[55]   The influence of decision criteria upon remembering and knowing in recognition memory [J].
Postma, A .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 103 (1-2) :65-76
[56]   PROCESS DISSOCIATION, SINGLE-PROCESS THEORIES, AND RECOGNITION MEMORY [J].
RATCLIFF, R ;
VANZANDT, T ;
MCKOON, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1995, 124 (04) :352-374
[57]   A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm [J].
Reder, LM ;
Nhouyvanisvong, A ;
Schunn, CD ;
Ayers, MS ;
Angstadt, P ;
Hiraki, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (02) :294-320
[58]  
REINSEL RA, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P612
[59]   Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? [J].
Rotello, CM ;
Heit, E .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 40 (03) :432-453
[60]   PRAGMATICS OF MEASURING RECOGNITION MEMORY - APPLICATIONS TO DEMENTIA AND AMNESIA [J].
SNODGRASS, JG ;
CORWIN, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1988, 117 (01) :34-50