Impact and Feasibility of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients with Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Huang, Elbert S. [1 ]
Nathan, Aviva G. [1 ]
Cooper, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Lee, Sang Mee [2 ]
Shin, Na [1 ]
John, Priya M. [1 ]
Dale, William [3 ]
Col, Nananda F. [4 ]
Meltzer, David O. [5 ]
Chin, Marshall H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Gen Internal Med Sect, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Sect Geriatr & Palliat Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Shared Decis Making Resources, Georgetown, ME USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Sect Hosp Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
type; 2; diabetes; aging; personalized medicine; decision aids; decision support; chronic disease modeling; randomized trial; LIFETIME HEALTH OUTCOMES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; TYPE-2; MELLITUS; CARE; AID; OVERTREATMENT; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X16654142
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Diabetes guidelines recommend individualizing glycemic goals (A1C) for older patients. The aim of this study was to assess a personalized Web-based decision support tool. Methods. We randomized physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes (65 years of age) to a support tool or educational pamphlet (75:25 patients). Prior to a visit, intervention patients interacted with the tool, which provided personalized risk predictions and elicited treatment preferences. Main outcomes included 1) patient-doctor communication, 2) decisional conflict, 3) changes in goals, and 4) intervention acceptability. Results. We did not find significant differences in proportions of patients who had an A1C discussion (91% intervention v. 76% control; P = 0.19). Intervention patients had larger declines in the informed subscale of decisional conflict (-20 v. 0, respectively; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in proportions of patients with changes in goals (49% v. 28%, respectively; P = 0.08). Most intervention patients reported that the tool was easy to use (91%) and helped them to communicate (84%). A limitation was that this was a pilot trial at one academic institution. Conclusions. Web-based decision support tools may be a practical approach to facilitating the personalization of goals for chronic conditions. Trial registration: NCT02169999 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02169999).
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 617
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of ENHANCED (diEtitiaNs Helping pAtieNts CarE for Diabetes) Telemedicine Randomized Controlled Trial on Diabetes Optimal Care Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Benson, Gretchen A.
    Sidebottom, Abbey
    Hayes, Joy
    Miedema, Michael D.
    Boucher, Jackie
    Vacquier, Marc
    Sillah, Arthur
    Gamam, Safa
    VanWormer, Jeff J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2019, 119 (04) : 585 - 598
  • [42] The effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive function in middle-aged and older individuals with type 2 diabetes: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Tingting
    Lo, Wen-Juo
    Chen, Jie
    Wang, Jing
    Li, Changwei
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2024, 60 : 677 - 685
  • [43] Feasibility of Motivational Interviewing to Engage Older Inpatients in Fall Prevention A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kiyoshi-Teo, Hiroko
    Northup-Snyder, Kathlynn
    Cohen, Deborah J.
    Dieckmann, Nathan
    Stoyles, Sydnee
    Eckstrom, Elizabeth
    Winters-Stone, Kerri
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2019, 45 (09): : 19 - +
  • [44] Shared decision-making support program for older patients with advanced cancer using a question prompt list and geriatric assessment: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Obama, Kyoko
    Fujimori, Maiko
    Boku, Narikazu
    Matsuoka, Ayumu
    Mori, Keita
    Okizaki, Ayumi
    Miyaji, Tempei
    Okamura, Masako
    Majima, Yoshiyuki
    Goto, Shinichi
    Shimazu, Taichi
    Uchitomi, Yosuke
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (05)
  • [45] Feasibility of decision rule-based treatment of comorbid youth: A pilot randomized control trial
    Wolff, Jennifer C.
    Garcia, Abbe
    Kelly, Lourah M.
    Frazier, Elisabeth A.
    Jones, Richard N.
    Spirito, Anthony
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2020, 131
  • [46] Regular mailing of personalized feedback reports improves glycemic control in diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
    Yin, Junmei
    Luk, Andrea
    Wong, Rebecca
    Chung, Harriet
    Kong, Alice
    Ozaki, Risa
    Ma, Ronald
    Chow, Chun-Chung
    So, Wingyee
    Chan, Juliana
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2017, 9 (05) : 536 - 538
  • [47] Carbohydrate Counting App Using Image Recognition for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: Pilot Randomized Control Trial
    Alfonsi, Jeffrey E.
    Choi, Elizabeth E. Y.
    Arshad, Taha
    Sammott, Stacie-Ann S.
    Pais, Vanita
    Nguyen, Cynthia
    Maguire, Bryan R.
    Stinson, Jennifer N.
    Palmert, Mark R.
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (10):
  • [48] Adherence therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes: a feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial
    Alenazi, Fatimah
    Peddle, Monica
    Bressington, Daniel
    Mahzari, Moeber
    Gray, Richard
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [49] A Randomized Pilot Study of the Effect of Trelagliptin and Alogliptin on Glycemic Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Nishimura, Rimei
    Osonoi, Takeshi
    Koike, Yasuhiro
    Miyata, Kouji
    Shimasaki, Yukio
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2019, 36 (11) : 3096 - 3109
  • [50] Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial in primary care
    Megan E Branda
    Annie LeBlanc
    Nilay D Shah
    Kristina Tiedje
    Kari Ruud
    Holly Van Houten
    Laurie Pencille
    Marge Kurland
    Barbara Yawn
    Victor M Montori
    BMC Health Services Research, 13