Impact and Feasibility of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients with Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Huang, Elbert S. [1 ]
Nathan, Aviva G. [1 ]
Cooper, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Lee, Sang Mee [2 ]
Shin, Na [1 ]
John, Priya M. [1 ]
Dale, William [3 ]
Col, Nananda F. [4 ]
Meltzer, David O. [5 ]
Chin, Marshall H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Gen Internal Med Sect, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Sect Geriatr & Palliat Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Shared Decis Making Resources, Georgetown, ME USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Sect Hosp Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
type; 2; diabetes; aging; personalized medicine; decision aids; decision support; chronic disease modeling; randomized trial; LIFETIME HEALTH OUTCOMES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; TYPE-2; MELLITUS; CARE; AID; OVERTREATMENT; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X16654142
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Diabetes guidelines recommend individualizing glycemic goals (A1C) for older patients. The aim of this study was to assess a personalized Web-based decision support tool. Methods. We randomized physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes (65 years of age) to a support tool or educational pamphlet (75:25 patients). Prior to a visit, intervention patients interacted with the tool, which provided personalized risk predictions and elicited treatment preferences. Main outcomes included 1) patient-doctor communication, 2) decisional conflict, 3) changes in goals, and 4) intervention acceptability. Results. We did not find significant differences in proportions of patients who had an A1C discussion (91% intervention v. 76% control; P = 0.19). Intervention patients had larger declines in the informed subscale of decisional conflict (-20 v. 0, respectively; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in proportions of patients with changes in goals (49% v. 28%, respectively; P = 0.08). Most intervention patients reported that the tool was easy to use (91%) and helped them to communicate (84%). A limitation was that this was a pilot trial at one academic institution. Conclusions. Web-based decision support tools may be a practical approach to facilitating the personalization of goals for chronic conditions. Trial registration: NCT02169999 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02169999).
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 617
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Data-Driven Personalized Feedback to Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
    Skrovseth, Stein Olav
    Arsand, Eirik
    Godtliebsen, Fred
    Joakimsen, Ragnar M.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 17 (07) : 482 - 489
  • [22] Feasibility and acceptability of a decision aid designed for people facing advanced or terminal illness: a pilot randomized trial
    Matlock, Dan D.
    Keech, Tarah A. E.
    McKenzie, Marlene B.
    Bronsert, Michael R.
    Nowels, Carolyn T.
    Kutner, Jean S.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [23] The Impact of a Community-Based Food Education Program on Nutrition-Related Knowledge in Middle-Aged and Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Vasconcelos, Carlos
    Almeida, Antonio
    Cabral, Maria
    Ramos, Elisabete
    Mendes, Romeu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (13)
  • [24] Clinical impact of pharmacogenetic profiling with a clinical decision support tool in polypharmacy home health patients: A prospective pilot randomized controlled trial
    Elliott, Lindsay S.
    Henderson, John C.
    Neradilek, Moni B.
    Moyer, Nicolas A.
    Ashcraft, Kristine C.
    Thirumaran, Ranjit K.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [25] Development and Evaluation of a Tailored Mobile Health Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence in Black Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: Pilot Randomized Feasibility Trial
    Schoenthaler, Antoinette
    Leon, Michelle
    Butler, Mark
    Steinhaeuser, Karsten
    Wardzinski, William
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (09):
  • [26] A randomized controlled trial protocol testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease
    Brown, Leanne
    Gardner, Glenn
    Bonner, Ann
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (05) : 1191 - 1202
  • [27] Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of different intensities of functional training in elderly type 2 diabetes patients with cognitive impairment: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Ghahfarrokhi, Majid Mardaniyan
    Shirvani, Hossein
    Rahimi, Mostafa
    Bazgir, Behzad
    Shamsadini, Alireza
    Sobhani, Vahid
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [28] A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the BREASTChoice Tool for Personalized Decision Support About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Politi, Mary C.
    Lee, Clara N.
    Philpott-Streiff, Sydney E.
    Foraker, Randi E.
    Olsen, Margaret A.
    Merrill, Corinne
    Tao, Yu
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (02) : 230 - 237
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of linagliptin to improve glucose control in older people with type 2 diabetes on stable insulin therapy: A randomized trial
    Ledesma, Gilbert
    Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
    Morley, John E.
    Lewis-D'Agostino, Diane
    Keller, Annett
    Meinicke, Thomas
    van der Walt, Sandra
    von Eynatten, Maximilian
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (11) : 2465 - 2473
  • [30] Impact of a Discontinuous Training Program on Sedentary Behavior in Italian Type 2 Diabetes Older Patients: The Results of the TRIPL-A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bonfigli, Anna Rita
    Gagliardi, Cristina
    Protic, Olga
    Lamedica, Adrianapia Maria
    Luconi, Maria Paola
    Turchi, Federica
    Tortato, Elena
    Di Rosa, Mirko
    Lucertini, Francesco
    Spazzafumo, Liana
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (08)