Impact and Feasibility of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients with Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Huang, Elbert S. [1 ]
Nathan, Aviva G. [1 ]
Cooper, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Lee, Sang Mee [2 ]
Shin, Na [1 ]
John, Priya M. [1 ]
Dale, William [3 ]
Col, Nananda F. [4 ]
Meltzer, David O. [5 ]
Chin, Marshall H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Gen Internal Med Sect, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Sect Geriatr & Palliat Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Shared Decis Making Resources, Georgetown, ME USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Sect Hosp Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
type; 2; diabetes; aging; personalized medicine; decision aids; decision support; chronic disease modeling; randomized trial; LIFETIME HEALTH OUTCOMES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; TYPE-2; MELLITUS; CARE; AID; OVERTREATMENT; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X16654142
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Diabetes guidelines recommend individualizing glycemic goals (A1C) for older patients. The aim of this study was to assess a personalized Web-based decision support tool. Methods. We randomized physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes (65 years of age) to a support tool or educational pamphlet (75:25 patients). Prior to a visit, intervention patients interacted with the tool, which provided personalized risk predictions and elicited treatment preferences. Main outcomes included 1) patient-doctor communication, 2) decisional conflict, 3) changes in goals, and 4) intervention acceptability. Results. We did not find significant differences in proportions of patients who had an A1C discussion (91% intervention v. 76% control; P = 0.19). Intervention patients had larger declines in the informed subscale of decisional conflict (-20 v. 0, respectively; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in proportions of patients with changes in goals (49% v. 28%, respectively; P = 0.08). Most intervention patients reported that the tool was easy to use (91%) and helped them to communicate (84%). A limitation was that this was a pilot trial at one academic institution. Conclusions. Web-based decision support tools may be a practical approach to facilitating the personalization of goals for chronic conditions. Trial registration: NCT02169999 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02169999).
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 617
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Personalized DiaBetes TEXT Messaging Combined with Peer Support Education on Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Romadlon, Debby Syahru
    Huang, Hui-Chuan
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Hu, Sophia H.
    Kurniawan, Rudy
    Tarigan, Tri Juli Edi
    Al Baqi, Safiruddin
    Hasan, Faizul
    Chiu, Hsiao-Yean
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025,
  • [2] Impact of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Diabetes Care: A Randomized Trial
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
    Rush, William A.
    Johnson, Paul E.
    Amundson, Gerald H.
    Asche, Stephen E.
    Ekstrom, Heidi L.
    Gilmer, Todd P.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 9 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [3] The impact of obstructive sleep apnea treatment on microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: a feasibility randomized controlled trial
    Makhdom, Esraa A.
    Maher, Alisha
    Ottridge, Ryan
    Nicholls, Mathew
    Ali, Asad
    Cooper, Brendan G.
    Ajjan, Ramzi A.
    Bellary, Srikanth
    Hanif, Wasim
    Hanna, Fahmy
    Hughes, David
    Jayagopal, Vijay
    Mahto, Rajni
    Patel, Mayank
    Young, James
    Nayak, Ananth U.
    Chen, Mimi Z.
    Kyaw-Tun, Julie
    Gonzalez, Susana
    Gouni, Ravikanth
    Subramanian, Anuradhaa
    Adderley, Nicola
    Patel, Smitaa
    Tahrani, Abd A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2024, 20 (06): : 947 - 957
  • [4] Impact of Motivational Interviewing on Self-Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wong, Man Kin
    Cheng, Sai Yip Ronald
    Chu, Tsun Kit
    Lam, Fung Yee
    Lai, Shiu Kee
    Wong, Kai Chung
    Liang, Jun
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2020, 9 (03):
  • [5] Web-Based TangPlan and WeChat Combination to Support Self-management for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Xia, Shu-Fang
    Maitiniyazi, Gusonghan
    Chen, Yue
    Wu, Xiao-Ya
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhang, Xiao-Yan
    Li, Zi-Yuan
    Liu, Yuan
    Qiu, Yu-Yu
    Wang, Jun
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2022, 10 (03):
  • [6] Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial in primary care
    Branda, Megan E.
    LeBlanc, Annie
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Tiedje, Kristina
    Ruud, Kari
    Van Houten, Holly
    Pencille, Laurie
    Kurland, Marge
    Yawn, Barbara
    Montori, Victor M.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [7] A randomized controlled trial testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease
    Brown, Leanne
    Gardner, Glenn
    Bonner, Ann
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (11) : 3032 - 3044
  • [8] Decision Support for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Birnie, David
    Carroll, Sandra L.
    Brousseau-Whaley, Carolynne
    Clark, Lorraine
    Green, Martin
    Nair, Girish M.
    Nery, Pablo B.
    Redpath, Calum
    Stacey, Dawn
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2021, 36 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [9] Effect of the statin choice encounter decision aid in Spanish patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Rivero-Santana, Amado
    Boronat, Mauro
    Sanchez-Afonso, Juan A.
    Perez-Ramos, Jeanette
    Montori, Victor M.
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (02) : 295 - 299
  • [10] SITAgliptin for Depressive Symptoms in Type 2 Diabetes: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
    Moulton, Calum D.
    Rokakis, Anna S.
    Pickup, John C.
    Young, Allan H.
    Stahl, Daniel
    Ismail, Khalida
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2021, 83 (08): : 913 - 923