Delay to formalin fixation effect on breast biomarkers

被引:166
作者
Khoury, Thaer [1 ]
Sait, Sheila [2 ]
Hwang, Helena [1 ]
Chandrasekhar, Rameela [3 ]
Wilding, Gregory [3 ]
Tan, Dongfeng [4 ]
Kulkarni, Swati [5 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Cytogenet, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[3] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Biostat, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
breast cancer; biomarkers; delay to formalin fixation; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LIGAND-BINDING ASSAY; RECEPTOR LEVELS; CANCER; ESTROGEN; TRASTUZUMAB; THERAPY; AMPLIFICATION; CARCINOMA; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.2009.117
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Delay to formalin fixation may invalidate hormone receptors and HER2 analyses. Invalid results of tumor markers could significantly alter the type of adjuvant therapy a patient receives and potentially impact outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of progressive delay to formalin fixation on breast cancer biomarkers. Ten palpable invasive breast cancers were resected and underwent immediate gross evaluation. For each case, the procured tumor was divided into eight parts and consecutively fixed after 0, 10, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h; one section was kept in saline and stored overnight at 4 degrees C. Two tissue microarray blocks were constructed. Estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization were carried out. Statistical analyses including non-parametric sign test, exact McNemar's test and Page's L test were used. All 10 cases were invasive ductal carcinomas. Q score >= 6 was identified in five cases for estrogen receptor and four for progesterone receptor. Mean Q score started to decline at the 2 h mark for estrogen receptor and 1 h mark for progesterone receptor. Lowest score was at 8 h mark for estrogen receptor and overnight for progesterone receptor. HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization started to be compromised for interpretation at the 1 h mark and became statistically significant at the 2 h mark (P<0.03). To avoid delay to formalin fixation as a factor negatively affecting on breast biomarkers, we recommend not to delay formalin fixation for more than 1 h and not to store specimens overnight. Modern Pathology (2009) 22, 1457-1467; doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.117; published online 4 September 2009
引用
收藏
页码:1457 / 1467
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Alberts SR, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V78, P764
[2]  
[Anonymous], BREAST J
[3]   Effect of prolonged formalin fixation on the immunohistochemical reactivity of breast markers [J].
Arber, DA .
APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2002, 10 (02) :183-186
[4]   Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: Comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients [J].
Barnes, DM ;
Harris, WH ;
Smith, P ;
Millis, RR ;
Rubens, RD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 74 (09) :1445-1451
[5]   Increased use of immunohistochemistry for oestrogen receptor measurement in mammary carcinoma: The need for quality assurance [J].
Barnes, DM ;
Millis, RR ;
Beex, LVAM ;
Thorpe, SM ;
Leake, RE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (11) :1677-1682
[6]  
Baselga J, 1998, CANCER RES, V58, P2825
[7]   2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J].
Bast, RC ;
Ravdin, P ;
Hayes, DF ;
Bates, S ;
Fritsche, H ;
Jessup, JM ;
Kemeny, N ;
Locker, GY ;
Mennel, RG ;
Somerfield, MR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1865-1878
[8]  
BORG A, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, P4332
[9]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[10]  
ELLIS LM, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P39