Comparison of Endothelial Barrier Functional Recovery After Implantation of a Novel Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Comparison to Durable- and Biodegradable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents

被引:10
|
作者
Sakamoto, Atsushi [1 ]
Torii, Sho [1 ]
Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Guo, Liang [1 ]
Cornelissen, Anne [1 ]
Kuntz, Salome [1 ]
Cheng, Qi [1 ]
Fernandez, Raquel [1 ]
Paek, Ka Hyun [1 ]
Harris, Kathryn [2 ]
Srivastava, Mukta C. [2 ]
Kolodgie, Frank D. [1 ]
Virmani, Renu [1 ]
Finn, Aloke, V [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CVPath Inst Inc, 19 Firstfield Rd, Gaithersburg, MD 20878 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Drug eluting stent; Biodegradable polymer; Durable polymer; Endothelial function; Vascular permeability;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2020.08.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: The advantage of biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) versus durable-polymer (DP) DES remains uncertain. We compared neointimal formation and endothelial barrier function of new BP sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES, BuMA Supreme (R)) to other contemporary BP-DES, DP-DES, and bare metal stents (BMS). Methods and results: Light microscopic assessment in swine coronary arteries showed comparable neointimal formation between BP-SES and DP everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES). The performance of BP-SES was compared with DP-EES (Xience Xpedition (R)), BP-EES (Synergy (R)), and BMS (Multi-Link Vision (R)) at 45- and 90-days in rabbit ilio-femoral arteries using Evans blue dye (EBD) followed by immunostaining for endothelial barrier proteins (p120/vascular endothelial-cadherin [VE-cad]) to evaluate endothelial barrier function and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to determine strut tissue coverage. BMS followed by BP-SES and BP-EES exhibited smaller EBD positive areas versus that of DP-EES at 45- and 90-days. p120/VE-cad immunostaining and SEM-determined strut coverage was greater at 45- and 90-days for BMS followed by all DESs. Regardless of stent type, the lack of p120/VE-cad co-localization showed greater leukocyte and platelet aggregation. Conclusion: Three types of DES showed different endothelial healing pattern regardless their equivalent suppression of neointimal formation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between biodegradable- and durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents in hemodialysis patients with coronary artery disease
    Ito, Ryuta
    Ishii, Hideki
    Oshima, Satoru
    Nakayama, Takuya
    Sakakibara, Takashi
    Kakuno, Motohiko
    Murohara, Toyoaki
    CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 37 (03) : 475 - 482
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Yang, Yunjing
    Lei, Jiayan
    Huang, Wei
    Lei, Han
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 222 : 486 - 493
  • [43] Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: three-year follow-up of the COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) trial
    Vlachojannis, Georgios J.
    Smits, Pieter C.
    Hofma, Sjoerd H.
    Togni, Mario
    Vazquez, Nicolas
    Valdes, Mariano
    Voudris, Vassilis
    Puricel, Serban
    Slagboom, Ton
    Goy, Jean-Jacques
    den Heijer, Peter
    van der Ent, Martin
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2015, 11 (03) : 272 - 279
  • [44] Nine-month Angiographic and Two-year Clinical Follow-up of Novel Biodegradable-polymer Arsenic Trioxide-eluting Stent Versus Durable-polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent For Coronary Artery Disease
    Shen, Li
    Yang, Wei
    Yin, Jia-Sheng
    Liu, Xue-Bo
    Wu, Yi-Zhe
    Sun, Ai-Jun
    Qian, Ju-Ying
    Ge, Jun-Bo
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (06) : 768 - 773
  • [45] Comparison between biodegradable- and durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents in hemodialysis patients with coronary artery disease
    Ryuta Ito
    Hideki Ishii
    Satoru Oshima
    Takuya Nakayama
    Takashi Sakakibara
    Motohiko Kakuno
    Toyoaki Murohara
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2022, 37 : 475 - 482
  • [46] Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Ping Zhu
    Xin Zhou
    Chenliang Zhang
    Huakang Li
    Zhihui Zhang
    Zhiyuan Song
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 18
  • [47] Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Zhu, Ping
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhang, Chenliang
    Li, Huakang
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Song, Zhiyuan
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 18
  • [48] Comparison of the Absorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (MiStent) to the Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent (Xience) (from the DESSOLVE I/II and ISAR-TEST-4 Studies)
    Lansky, Alexandra J.
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Edelman, Elazer R.
    Parise, Helen
    Ng, Vivian G.
    Ormiston, John
    Wijns, William
    Byrne, Robert A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 117 (04) : 532 - 538
  • [49] Nine-month Angiographic and Two-year Clinical Follow-up of Novel Biodegradable-polymer Arsenic Trioxide-eluting Stent Versus Durable-polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent For Coronary Artery Disease
    Shen Li
    Yang Wei
    Yin Jia-Sheng
    Liu Xue-Bo
    Wu Yi-Zhe
    Sun Ai-Jun
    Qian Ju-Ying
    Ge Jun-Bo
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2015, 128 (06) : 768 - 773
  • [50] Final five-year outcomes after implantation of biodegradable polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents
    Jakobsen, Lars
    Christiansen, Evald H.
    Maeng, Michael
    Hansen, Knud N.
    Kristensen, Steen D.
    Botker, Hans E.
    Terkelsen, Christian J.
    Jensen, Svend E.
    Raungaard, Bent
    Madsen, Morten
    Lassen, Jens F.
    Jensen, Lisette O.
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2017, 13 (11) : 1337 - 1345