Benchmarking industrial water purification systems with the aid of life cycle assessment

被引:4
作者
Yalamacilar, Busra Burcu [1 ]
Elginoz, Nilay [2 ]
Babuna, Fatos Germirli [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Environm Engn Dept, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Engn Sci Chem Biotechnol & Hlth, Chem Engn Dept, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Water purification; Reverse osmosis; Ion exchange; Environmental impacts; Life cycle assessment; DESALINATION; TECHNOLOGIES; CHLORINATION;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2021.26574
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Water is among the essential inputs of many industrial production processes. Substantial amounts of water with varying qualities is of importance in running quite a number of industrial sectors. The water quality requirements necessitate the application of different water purification systems. This study concentrates on comparing the environmental impacts of reverse osmosis and an ion exchange system that treat the water supplied from a well to a quality suitable for boiler water makeup. Life cycle assessment methodology is adopted for this evaluation. Purification system with the ion exchanger requires 18.6% less energy in comparison with the reverse osmosis system. However, substantially higher environmental impacts are obtained for the ion exchanger system when compared with the treatment scheme of reverse osmosis. Hence, the reverse osmosis system should be favored. Changing the source of energy from the grid mix to wind power is observed to further reduce abiotic depletion potential (fossil), human toxicity potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, and terrestric ecotoxicity potential for the reverse osmosis system.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 431
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An environmental and economic assessment based on life cycle approaches for industrial wastewater treatment and water recovery
    Capa, Seda
    Ozdemir, Alp
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Banar, Mufide
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 49
  • [42] Life cycle assessment of industrial production of microalgal oil from heterotrophic fermentation
    Lu, Yue
    Mu, Dongyan
    Xue, Zhonglin
    Xu, Peilun
    Li, Yueming
    Xiang, Wenliang
    Burnett, Justine
    Bryant, Katelyn
    Zhou, Wenguang
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2021, 58
  • [43] Life cycle assessment of electrochemical and mechanical energy storage systems
    Lundahl, Meri
    Lappalainen, Heikki
    Rinne, Marja
    Lundstroem, Mari
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 10 : 2036 - 2046
  • [44] Life Cycle Assessment experiences for solar heating and cooling systems
    Beccali, Marco
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Cusenza, Maria Anna
    Longo, Sonia
    Mugnier, Daniel
    Selke, Tim
    Pedro Gines, Vicente Quiles
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ISES EUROSUN 2018 CONFERENCE - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOLAR ENERGY FOR BUILDINGS AND INDUSTRY, 2018, : 493 - 504
  • [45] Characterizing the fossil fuel impacts in water desalination plants in Kuwait: A Life Cycle Assessment approach
    Al-Shayji, Khawla
    Aleisa, Esra
    ENERGY, 2018, 158 : 681 - 692
  • [46] Use of benchmarking techniques to improve communication in life cycle assessment: A general review
    Galindro, Bruno Menezes
    Zanghelini, Guilherme Marcelo
    Soares, Sebastido Roberto
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 : 143 - 157
  • [47] Critical reviews and benchmarking Tunisian clinker and cement with life cycle assessment results
    Cherni, Makrem
    Sebei, Abdelaziz
    Amor, Ben
    Hssine, Naziha
    Hajjaji, Noureddine
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2024, 20
  • [48] Holistic analysis of urban water systems in the Greater Cincinnati region: (1) life cycle assessment and cost implications
    Xue, Xiaobo
    Cashman, Sarah
    Gaglione, Anthony
    Mosley, Janet
    Weiss, Lori
    Ma, Xin Cissy
    Cashdollar, Jennifer
    Garland, Jay
    WATER RESEARCH X, 2019, 2
  • [49] Life cycle assessment of water recycling technology
    Tangsubkul, N
    Beavis, P
    Moore, SJ
    Lundie, S
    Waite, TD
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2005, 19 (05) : 521 - 537
  • [50] Life Cycle Assessment of Water Recycling Technology
    N. Tangsubkul
    P. Beavis
    S. J. Moore
    S. Lundie
    T. D. Waite
    Water Resources Management, 2005, 19 : 521 - 537