Benchmarking industrial water purification systems with the aid of life cycle assessment

被引:4
作者
Yalamacilar, Busra Burcu [1 ]
Elginoz, Nilay [2 ]
Babuna, Fatos Germirli [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Environm Engn Dept, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Engn Sci Chem Biotechnol & Hlth, Chem Engn Dept, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Water purification; Reverse osmosis; Ion exchange; Environmental impacts; Life cycle assessment; DESALINATION; TECHNOLOGIES; CHLORINATION;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2021.26574
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Water is among the essential inputs of many industrial production processes. Substantial amounts of water with varying qualities is of importance in running quite a number of industrial sectors. The water quality requirements necessitate the application of different water purification systems. This study concentrates on comparing the environmental impacts of reverse osmosis and an ion exchange system that treat the water supplied from a well to a quality suitable for boiler water makeup. Life cycle assessment methodology is adopted for this evaluation. Purification system with the ion exchanger requires 18.6% less energy in comparison with the reverse osmosis system. However, substantially higher environmental impacts are obtained for the ion exchanger system when compared with the treatment scheme of reverse osmosis. Hence, the reverse osmosis system should be favored. Changing the source of energy from the grid mix to wind power is observed to further reduce abiotic depletion potential (fossil), human toxicity potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, and terrestric ecotoxicity potential for the reverse osmosis system.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 431
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of water reuse systems in an industrial park
    Tong, Le
    Liu, Xin
    Liu, Xuewei
    Yuan, Zengwei
    Zhang, Qiong
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 129 : 471 - 478
  • [2] Life cycle assessment to evaluate the integral water cycle in industrial supply: A real case study
    Rodriguez-Chueca, Jorge
    Banuelos, Asier Criado
    Rodriguez, Javier Perez
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 931
  • [3] A comparative life cycle assessment of process water treatment technologies at the Secunda industrial complex, South Africa
    Ras, C.
    von Blottnitz, H.
    WATER SA, 2012, 38 (04) : 549 - 554
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of three water systems in Copenhagen-a management tool of the future
    Godskesen, B.
    Zambrano, K. C.
    Trautner, A.
    Johansen, N. -B.
    Thiesson, L.
    Andersen, L.
    Clauson-Kaas, J.
    Neidel, T. L.
    Rygaard, M.
    Kloverpris, N. H.
    Albrechtsen, H. -J.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 63 (03) : 565 - 572
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of three water supply systems: Importation, reclamation and desalination
    Lyons, E.
    Zhang, P.
    Benn, T.
    Sharif, F.
    Li, K.
    Crittenden, J.
    Costanza, M.
    Chen, Y.S.
    Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2009, 9 (04): : 439 - 448
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of an industrial water recycling plant
    Pillay, SD
    Friedrich, E
    Buckley, CA
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (09) : 55 - 62
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of an industrial gold mining in Mali
    Konare, Zan Mary
    Ajayi, Dickson Dare
    Ba, Sidy
    Aremu, Ademola Kabiru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (06) : 983 - 999
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment of Industrial Wastewater Treatment Trains
    Tran, Dana
    Weidhaas, Jennifer
    ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS, 2024, 8 (12):
  • [9] Life cycle energy assessment of alternative water supply systems
    Stokes, Jennifer
    Horvath, Arpad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2006, 11 (05) : 335 - 343
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of domestic hot water systems in Australia
    Moore, A. D.
    Urmee, T.
    Bahri, P. A.
    Rezvani, S.
    Baverstock, G. F.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 103 : 187 - 196