Comparing the Effects of Tongue-In-Groove and Septocolumellar Suture With Short and Floating Columellar Strut of Open Rhinoplasty on Nasal Tip Rotation and Projection

被引:5
作者
Aksakal, Ceyhun [1 ]
机构
[1] Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Gultekin Topcam Boulvard,Yeni Cadde, TR-60100 Tokat, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.030
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: In rhinoplasty, it is important to maintain the desired tip projection and rotation. The aim of the present study was to compare the tongue-in-groove (TIG) method and the septocolumellar suture method with short and floating columellar strut methods over a six-month follow-up period. Methods: A total of 69 patients were evaluated. The TIG method was used on 39 patients (group 1, TIG group), and the remaining 30 patients received septocolumellar suture supported with short and floating columellar strut (group 2, suture + graft group). Standardized right profile images were taken preoperatively and 6 months after the operations. Goode's method and nasofacial angle were used to evaluate nasal tip projection, and the nasolabial angle was measured to evaluate tip rotation. The outcomes of the 2 surgical approaches were compared, and P values lower than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Although nasal tip rotation in the postoperative sixth month was higher than that in the preoperative period in both groups (TIG: 96.8 degrees vs 108.2 degrees and suture + graft: 100.8 degrees vs 104.2 degrees, respectively), this change was significant only in the TIG group (P <.001). Goode's ratio increased significantly in both groups compared with the postoperative period (TIG: 0.62 vs 0.57 and suture + graft: 0.62 vs 0.58; P <.001 and.047, respectively). On the other hand, nasofacial angle decreased significantly in both groups compared with the postoperative period (TIG: 147.8 degrees vs 144.0 degrees and suture + graft: 149.1 degrees vs 146.3 degrees; P <.001). Conclusions: As per the results of the present study, both studied methods can be safely used in nasal tip surgery. Compared with the septocolumellar suture + columellar strut method, the TIG method resulted in a higher rotation increase. Both methods led to significant increases in projection, and these increases did not differ between the groups. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:474.e1 / 474.e11
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Projection and Deprojection Techniques in Rhinoplasty [J].
Apaydin, Fazil .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 43 (01) :151-+
[2]   Caudal extension graft versus columellar strut with plumping graft for acute nasolabial angle correction in rhinoplasty surgery [J].
Atighechi, S. ;
Sajadinejad, B. S. ;
Baradaranfar, M. H. ;
Dadgarnia, M. H. ;
Shahbazian, H. .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 272 (07) :1673-1677
[3]   Revisiting the Role of Columellar Strut Graft in Primary Open Approach Rhinoplasty [J].
Bitik, Ozan ;
Uzun, Hakan ;
Kamburoglu, Haldun O. ;
Calis, Mert ;
Zins, James E. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (04) :987-997
[4]   Open rhinoplasty using a columellar strut: effects of the graft on nasal tip projection and rotation [J].
Bucher, S. ;
Kunz, S. ;
Deggeller, M. ;
Holzmann, D. ;
Soyka, M. B. .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 277 (05) :1371-1377
[5]   Nasal Tip Grafts [J].
Cingi, Cemal ;
Muluk, Nuray Bayar ;
Winkler, Andrew ;
Thomas, J. Regan .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (07) :1914-1921
[6]   The Tongue-in-Groove Technique in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty [J].
Datema, Frank R. ;
Lohuis, Peter J. F. M. .
FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 32 (04) :416-423
[7]   Tongue-in-Groove Setback of the Medial Crura to Control Nasal Tip Deprojection in Open Rhinoplasty [J].
Datema, Frank R. ;
Lohuis, Peter J. F. M. .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 39 (01) :53-62
[8]   Comparison of Tongue-in-Groove and Columellar Strut on Rotation and Projection in Droopy Nasal Tip: Contribution of a Cap Graft [J].
Demir, Uygar Levent .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (03) :558-561
[9]  
Farkas L.G., 1994, ANTHROPOMETRY HEAD F
[10]   GEOGRAPHY OF THE NOSE - A MORPHOMETRIC STUDY [J].
FARKAS, LG ;
KOLAR, JC ;
MUNRO, IR .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 1986, 10 (04) :191-223