Evaluation of pain during mobilization and endotracheal aspiration in critical patients

被引:25
作者
Robleda, G. [1 ,2 ]
Roche-Campo, F. [1 ,3 ]
Membrilla-Martinez, L. [4 ]
Fernandez-Lucio, A. [4 ]
Villamor-Vazquez, M. [5 ]
Merten, A. [5 ]
Gich, I. [6 ,7 ]
Mancebo, J. [1 ]
Catala-Puigbo, E. [5 ]
Banos, J. E. [8 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Serv Med Intensiva, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Programa Doctorado Med, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Tortosa Verge Cinta, Serv Med Intensiva, Tarragona, Spain
[4] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Unidad Cuidados Criticos Postquirurgicos, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Serv Anestesiol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, IIB, Dept Epidemiol Clin & Salud Publ, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Consorcio Invest Biomed Epidemiol & Salud Publ CI, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[8] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Ciencias Expt & Salud, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Critically-ill patients; Pain assessment; Procedural pain; Tracheal aspiration; Mobilization with turning Bispectral index; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; CHEST TUBE REMOVAL; ILL PATIENTS; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; PROCEDURAL PAIN; CARDIAC-SURGERY; ANALGESIA; SEDATION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.medin.2015.03.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: 1) To assess the prevalence of pain during nursing care procedures, and 2) to evaluate the usefulness of certain vital signs and the bispectral index (BIS) in detecting pain. Methods: A prospective, observational analytical study was made of procedures (endotracheal aspiration and mobilization with turning) in critically ill sedated patients on mechanical ventilation. The Behavioral Pain Scale was used to assess pain, with scores of >= 3 indicating pain. Various physiological signs and BIS values were recorded, with changes of >10% being considered clinically relevant. Results: A total of 146 procedures in 70 patients were analyzed. Pain prevalence during the procedures was 94%. Vital signs and BIS values increased significantly during the procedures compared to resting conditions, but only the changes in BIS were considered clinically relevant. In the subgroup of patients receiving preemptive analgesia prior to the procedure, pain decreased significantly compared to the group of patients who received no such analgesia (-2 [IQR: {-5}-0] vs. 3 [IQR: 1-4]; P<.001, respectively). Conclusions: The procedures evaluated in this study are painful. Changes in vital signs are not good indicators of pain. Changes in BIS may provide useful information about pain, but more research is needed. The administration of preemptive analgesia decreases pain during the procedures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 104
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[31]   The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale - Validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients [J].
Sessler, CN ;
Gosnell, MS ;
Grap, MJ ;
Brophy, GM ;
O'Neal, PV ;
Keane, KA ;
Tesoro, EP ;
Elswick, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (10) :1338-1344
[32]   Patients' self-report of procedural pain in the intensive care unit [J].
Siffleet, Jo ;
Young, Jeanne ;
Nikoletti, Sue ;
Shaw, Therese .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2007, 16 (11) :2142-2148
[33]   Topical analgesia for chest tube removal in cardiac patients [J].
Singh, M ;
Gopinath, R .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2005, 19 (06) :719-722
[34]   Protocolized Intensive Care Unit Management of Analgesia, Sedation, and Delirium Improves Analgesia and Subsyndromal Delirium Rates [J].
Skrobik, Yoanna ;
Ahern, Stephane ;
Leblanc, Martine ;
Marquis, Francois ;
Awissi, Don Kelena ;
Kavanagh, Brian P. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (02) :451-463
[35]   RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE FACE, LEGS, ACTIVITY, CRY, CONSOLABILITY BEHAVIORAL TOOL IN ASSESSING ACUTE PAIN IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
Voepel-Lewis, Terri ;
Zanotti, Jennifer ;
Dammeyer, Jennifer A. ;
Merkel, Sandra .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 19 (01) :55-61
[36]  
Young Jeanne, 2006, Intensive Crit Care Nurs, V22, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.iccn.2005.04.004