Stimulant prescribing for the treatment of ADHD in Western Australia: socioeconomic and remoteness differences

被引:18
作者
Calver, Janine [1 ]
Preen, David
Bulsara, Max
Sanfilippo, Frank
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Ctr Res Ageing, Perth, WA 6001, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00834.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify whether the rate and average daily dose of stimulant prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Western Australia differed according to the geographical remoteness and socioeconomic status of the patient. Design and data sources: Secondary analysis of population-based administrative pharmacy data from 2004, stratified by the Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA+) categories and the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD) quintiles for WA (2001 Census). Outcome measures: Rate ratios of stimulant prescription and mean average daily dose (in dex-equivalents) stratified by age (2-17, 18+ years), sex, ARIA+ category and IRSD quintile. Results: The rate of stimulant prescription was 2.3 to 5.3 times greater in major cities in WA compared with remote and very remote parts of the state. The association between socioeconomic disadvantage and the rate of stimulant prescription was highly variable. Adults with the least socioeconomic disadvantage were significantly more likely to receive stimulants compared with their most disadvantaged counterparts; however, the reverse association was seen with children. The average daily dose of stimulant prescribed did not vary greatly across remoteness or socioeconomic categories. Conclusion: Remoteness and socioeconomic disadvantage are significantly associated with rate of stimulant prescription for ADHD in WA, but not associated with average daily dose of stimulant prescribed. Further research is needed to understand why considerable variation exists in the use of prescribed stimulants for ADHD.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 127
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CENS POP HOUS SOC IN
[2]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2001, OUTC ABS VIEWS REM C
[3]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2004, AUSTR HIST POP STAT
[4]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2005, AUSTR STAND GEOGR CL
[5]   Licit psychostimulant consumption in Australia, 1984-2000: international and jurisdictional comparison [J].
Berbatis, CG ;
Sunderland, VB ;
Bulsara, M .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 177 (10) :539-543
[6]  
BUCKMASTER L, 2004, MED ATTENTION DEFICI
[7]  
Education and Health Standing Committee of the Western Australian Legislative Assembly, 2004, ATT DEF HYP DIS W AU
[8]  
Glover J.D., 2003, Remote areas statistical geography in Australia: notes on the Accessibility/ Remoteness Index for Australia (ARIA+ version)
[9]   MISCLASSIFICATION OF SOCIAL DISADVANTAGE BASED ON GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS - COMPARISON OF POSTCODE AND COLLECTORS DISTRICT ANALYSES [J].
HYNDMAN, JCG ;
HOLMAN, CDJ ;
HOCKEY, RL ;
DONOVAN, RJ ;
CORTI, B ;
RIVERA, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (01) :165-176
[10]   International consensus statement on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and disruptive behaviour disorders (DBDs): Clinical implications and treatment practice suggestions [J].
Kutcher, S ;
Aman, M ;
Brooks, SJ ;
Buitelaar, J ;
van Daalen, E ;
Fegert, J ;
Findling, RL ;
Fisman, S ;
Greenhill, LL ;
Huss, M ;
Kusumakar, V ;
Pine, D ;
Taylor, E ;
Tyano, S .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) :11-28