Risk assessment and management of arsenic in source water in China

被引:36
|
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ]
Zheng, Binghui [1 ]
Fu, Qing [1 ]
Meng, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Yeyao [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
关键词
Risk assessment; Risk management; Drinking water sources; Source water; Permissible content of arsenic; DRINKING-WATER; QUALITY STANDARDS; UNITED-STATES; REMOVAL; COAGULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As part of our efforts to identify effective ways and means to keep source water safe, the concept of risk assessment and management is introduced in this paper to address the issue of risk assessment and management of arsenic in source water in China. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk are calculated for different concentrations of arsenic in source water using the corrective equation between potential health risk and concentration of arsenic in source water with purification process taken into consideration. It is justified through analyses that risk assessment and management is suitable for China to control pollution of source water. The permissible content of arsenic in source water should be set at 0.01 mg/L at present in China, and necessary risk management measures include control contaminated sources and improvement of purification efficiency. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 734
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arsenic and heavy metals at Japanese abandoned chemical weapons site in China: distribution characterization, source identification and contamination risk assessment
    Chao Ji
    Yongbing Zhu
    Sanping Zhao
    Huijun Zhang
    Shiyu Wang
    Jun Zhou
    Xiangcui Liu
    Yan Zhang
    Xiaodong Liu
    Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2023, 45 : 3069 - 3087
  • [42] Health Risk Assessment of Drinking Source Water in Wuhu
    Kai, Xiaoli
    Gao, Liangmin
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIFFUSE POLLUTION-MANAGEMENT MEASURES AND CONTROL TECHNIQUE, 2010, : 124 - 129
  • [43] Exposure to arsenic and other potentially toxic elements: health risk assessment and source analysis in the Wuming Basin, Guangxi Province, China
    Bo Hu
    Jie Li
    Rui Liu
    Guoxin Lei
    Xinyu Wang
    Lei Wang
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [44] Occurrence and health risk assessment of organotins in waterworks and the source water of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China
    Deng, Ting
    Wu, Lei
    Gao, Jun-Min
    Zhou, Bin
    Zhang, Ya-Li
    Wu, Wen-Nan
    Tang, Zhuo-Heng
    Jiang, Wen-Chao
    Huang, Wei-Lin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (15) : 15019 - 15028
  • [45] Environmental risk assessment of the middle route of south-to-north water transferring source project in China
    Wang Huadong
    Wang Fei(Institute of Environmental Sciences
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 1996, (03) : 285 - 291
  • [46] Occurrence and health risk assessment of organotins in waterworks and the source water of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China
    Ting Deng
    Lei Wu
    Jun-Min Gao
    Bin Zhou
    Ya-Li Zhang
    Wen-Nan Wu
    Zhuo-Heng Tang
    Wen-Chao Jiang
    Wei-Lin Huang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 15019 - 15028
  • [47] Occurrence and Risk Assessment of per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water Source Protection Area of Southeastern China
    He, Shu
    Ren, Nanqi
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [48] Arsenic toxicity, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis – a health risk assessment and management approach
    Paul B. Tchounwou
    Jose A. Centeno
    Anita K. Patlolla
    Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 2004, 255 : 47 - 55
  • [49] Regional Risk Assessment for Point Source Pollution Based on a Water Quality Model of the Taipu River, China
    Yao, Hong
    Qian, Xin
    Yin, Hong
    Gao, Hailong
    Wang, Yulei
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (02) : 265 - 277
  • [50] Using ecological risk assessment principles in a source water protection assessment
    Serveiss, Victor B.
    Ohlson, Dan W.
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2007, 13 (02): : 402 - 417