Antibiotic prescription monitoring and feedback in primary care in Switzerland: Design and rationale of a nationwide pragmatic randomized controlled trial

被引:5
作者
Glinz, Dominik [1 ]
Mc Cord, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Moffa, Giusi [2 ]
Aghlmandi, Soheila [1 ]
Saccilotto, Ramon [1 ]
Zeller, Andreas [3 ]
Widmer, Andreas F. [4 ]
Bielicki, Julia [5 ,6 ]
Kronenberg, Andreas [7 ]
Bucher, Heiner C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Univ Hosp Basel, Basel Inst Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Dept Clin Res, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel, Ctr Primary Hlth Care, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Basel, Div Infect Dis & Hosp Epidemiol, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Univ Basel, Infect Dis & Vaccinol, Childrens Hosp, Basel, Switzerland
[6] St Georges Univ London, London, England
[7] Univ Bern, Inst Infect Dis, Bern, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Antibiotics; Antimicrobial resistance; Low-cost intervention; Health-system level; Hospitalization; Prescription feedback; Primary care; Routinely collected patient data; Claims; GENERAL-PRACTICE; RESISTANCE; EXTENSION; DATABASE; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100712
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: Antibiotic consumption is highest in primary care, and antibiotic overuse furthers antimicrobial resistance. In our recently published pilot-RCT, we used monthly aggregated claims data to provide personalized antibiotic prescription feedback to general practitioners (GPs). The pilot-RCT has shown that personalized prescription feedback is a feasible and promising low-cost intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing. Here, we describe the rationale and design of the follow-up RCT with 3426 GPs in Switzerland. We now have access to pseudonymized patient-level data from routinely collected health insurance data of the three largest health insurers in Switzerland. Methods and analysis: 1713 GPs randomized to the intervention group received once evidence-based treatment guidelines at the beginning, including region-specific antibiotic resistance information from the community and personalized feedback of their antibiotic prescribing, followed by quarterly personalized prescription feedback for two years. The first and the last mailings were sent out in December 2017 and September 2019, respectively. The 1713 GPs randomized to the control group were not notified about the study and they received no guidelines and no prescription feedback. The personalized prescription feedbacks and the analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes are entirely based on pseudonymized patient-level data from routinely collected health insurance data. The primary outcome is prescribed antibiotics per 100 patient consultations during the second year of intervention. The secondary outcomes include antibiotic use during the entire two-year trial period, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, hospitalization rates (all-cause and infection-related), and antibiotic use in different age groups. If the feedback intervention proves to be efficacious, the intervention could be continued systemwide. Ethics and dissemination: The trial is publicly funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF, grant number 407240_167066). The trial was approved by the ethics committee "Ethikkommission Nordwest-und Zentralschweiz" (EKNZ Project-ID 2017-00888). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient quinolone use in Europe (1997-2009)
    Adriaenssens, Niels
    Coenen, Samuel
    Versporten, Ann
    Muller, Arno
    Minalu, Girma
    Faes, Christel
    Vankerckhoven, Vanessa
    Aerts, Marc
    Hens, Niel
    Molenberghs, Geert
    Goossens, Herman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 : 47 - 56
  • [2] Antibiotics in Dutch general practice: nationwide electronic GP database and national reimbursement rates
    Akkerman, Annemiek E.
    Kuyvenhoven, Mariike M.
    Verheij, Theo J. M.
    van Dijk, Liset
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2008, 17 (04) : 378 - 383
  • [3] Butler CC, 2012, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V344, DOI [10.1136/bmj.d8173, 10.1136/bmj.e682]
  • [4] Meeting the challenge of antibiotic resistance
    Cars, Otto
    Hogberg, Liselotte Diaz
    Murray, Mary
    Nordberg, Olle
    Sivaraman, Satya
    Lundborg, Cecilia Stalsby
    So, Anthony D.
    Tomson, Goran
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7672): : a1438
  • [5] Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Costelloe, Ceire
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Lovering, Andrew
    Mant, David
    Hay, Alastair D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 1120
  • [6] European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2016, SUMM LAT DAT ANT CON
  • [7] Federal Office of Public Health and Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, FOPH PUBL
  • [8] Improving antibiotic prescribing in acute respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial from Norwegian general practice (prescription peer academic detailing (Rx-PAD) study)
    Gjelstad, Svein
    Hoye, Sigurd
    Straand, Jorund
    Brekke, Mette
    Dalen, Ingvild
    Lindbaek, Morten
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [9] Quality of antibiotic prescribing of Swiss primary care physicians with high prescription rates: a nationwide survey
    Glinz, Dominik
    Reyes, Selene Leon
    Saccilotto, Ramon
    Widmer, Andreas F.
    Zeller, Andreas
    Bucher, Heiner C.
    Hemkens, Lars G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (11) : 3205 - 3212
  • [10] Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study.
    Goossens, H
    Ferech, M
    Stichele, RV
    Elseviers, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9459) : 579 - 587