Mode of action of the novel phenazine anticancer agents XR11576 and XR5944

The substituted phenazines XR11576 and XR5944 were originally described as dual topoisomerase-I/II poisons. Subsequent reports, however, indicated that the association of their cytotoxicity with cellular topoisomerases was not clear. We set out to study this further using human tumour cell lines, PEO1 ovarian cancer, MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and variants with acquired resistance to VP-16 and XR11576: PEO1VPR, MB-231VPR, MB-231-11576R and camptothecin: PEO1 CamR. Cytotoxicity testing [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay], DNA-protein crosslink formation, cell cycle analysis (flow cytometry) for DNA content, apoptosis (flow cytometry) for Annexin V and Western blotting for apoptotic factors. Cytotoxicity testing showed potent cytotoxicity with no cross-resistance to XR11576 or XR5944 in VP-16 or cam ptothecin-resistant lines. Importantly, we have shown for the first time that the activities of XR5944 and XR11576 are similar as MB-231-11576R cells were resistant to both agents and to a similar extent. XR5944 showed the greatest, albeit slower, interaction with DNA with high levels of DNA-protein crosslinks. Levels of apoptosis in XR5944-treated cells were significantly less than those in VP-16 or XR11576 treatments, suggestive of a more cytostatic rather than cytotoxic mode of action. Interestingly, XR5944 failed to give rise to a G(2)/M blockade, in contrast to VP-16 or XR11576. XR5944 and XR11576, in line with a dual topoisomerase-I/II-directed mechanism of action, retain potent activity in tumour cells with acquired resistance to VP-16 and camptothecin. Although these agents appear to behave differently from each other according to experimental conditions, this study suggests a substantial overlap in their mechanism(s) of action.