Order financing for promoting green transition

被引:56
作者
Wang, Chan [1 ]
Li, Xin-wu [1 ]
Wen, Hong-xing [1 ]
Nie, Pu-yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ GDUFE, Natl Econ Res Ctr, Sch Finance, Inst Guangdong Econ & Social Dev, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green finance; Order financing; Energy efficiency; Subsidy; LOW-CARBON; ENERGY; COMPETITION; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125415
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green finance plays a key role to drive the green transition, which is popular in both developed and developing countries. Different from direct financial subsidies, order financing, an emerging type of green finance, mainly contributes to the improvement of supervision mechanisms and the effectiveness of incentive mechanisms. This study focuses on the effects of order financing by considering carbon taxes. Based on game theory model, three major findings from the theoretical analysis are obtained. First, whether the firm launches a green transition or not mainly depends on the efficiency of clean technology, carbon taxes, marginal costs of energy, and the elasticity of effective energy input. Second, order financing encourages more firms to engage in green transition than mortgage financing does. With order financing, more firms can invest in clean technologies. Third, price fluctuation risk restricts the supply of order financing and the application of clean technologies. Third, this paper shows that mature clean technologies are easily adopted by firms. And to avoid price risk, banks would reduce order financing. Therefore, the policy implication is to encourage green finance for green transition with mature technology and a stable price. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Transition to Clean Technology [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Hanley, Douglas ;
Kerr, William .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (01) :52-104
[2]   Does financial development mitigate carbon emissions? Evidence from heterogeneous financial economies [J].
Acheampong, Alex O. ;
Amponsah, Mary ;
Boateng, Elliot .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 88
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PICT GREEN FIN SOC G
[4]   Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy [J].
Campiglio, Emanuele .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 121 :220-230
[5]   A clean innovation comparison between carbon tax and cap-and-trade system [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Wang, Chan ;
Nie, Pu-yan ;
Chen, Zi-rui .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 29
[6]   Emission regulation of conventional energy-intensive industries [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Wang, Chan ;
Nie, Pu-yan .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (04) :3723-3737
[7]   Subsidies under uncertainty: Modeling of input- and output-oriented policies [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Chen, Mei-xia ;
Mishra, Ashok K. .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 85 :39-56
[8]   ASYMMETRIC DOUPOLY COMPETITION WITH INNOVATION SPILLOVER AND INPUT CONSTRAINTS [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Nie, Pu-yan ;
Wang, X. Henry .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 16 (06) :1124-1139
[9]  
China Industry Research Network, 2013, AN 2012 PHOT SHUTD B
[10]   Environmental justice and conceptions of the green economy [J].
Ehresman, Timothy G. ;
Okereke, Chukwumerije .
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 15 (01) :13-27