The counterrevolution: A critique of recent proposals to reform no-fault divorce laws

被引:22
作者
Bradford, L
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1229344
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In this note, Laura Bradford looks at three proposals to return to consideration of fault to the divorce process. Bradford examines the history and effects of the no-fault revolution and concludes that these new proposals will not encourage increased moral behavior in marriage, will make the divorce process more difficult for women and children, and at the extreme may be unconstitutional.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 636
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   ANOTHER LOOK AT NO-FAULT DIVORCE AND THE POST-DIVORCE FINANCES OF WOMEN [J].
JACOB, H .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1989, 23 (01) :95-115
[42]   LEGAL PROFESSION AND NO-FAULT REFORM ISSUE [J].
FRINK, GR .
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1975, 61 (DEC) :1498-1500
[43]   A dead language: Divorce law and practice before no-fault [J].
Friedman, LM .
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 2000, 86 (07) :1497-1536
[44]   THE ALIMONY MYTH - DOES NO-FAULT DIVORCE MAKE A DIFFERENCE [J].
WEITZMAN, LJ ;
DIXON, RB .
FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY, 1980, 14 (03) :141-185
[46]   NO-FAULT DIVORCE - WHAT WENT WRONG - PARKMAN,AM [J].
BRINIG, MF .
FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY, 1993, 26 (04) :453-470
[49]   NO-FAULT DIVORCE: THE RIGHT DIRECTION TOWARDS THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE [J].
Chan, Leon Vincent ;
Min, Andrea Ang Si .
HONG KONG LAW JOURNAL, 2022, 52 :183-208
[50]   Making divorce easier: the role of no-fault and unilateral revisited [J].
Sietse Bracke ;
Klaas Mulier .
European Journal of Law and Economics, 2017, 43 :239-254