A New Revised Definition of Contract Cheating

被引:0
|
作者
Ullah, Shah Neyamat [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensand Univ, Sch Engn & technol, Gladstone, Qld, Australia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON 2020) | 2020年
关键词
contract cheating; definition; authentic assessments; academic Integrity; higher education; policy; COLLUSION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1109/educon45650.2020.9125118
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating has appeared to become a global phenomenon, where students outsource their assignments to external third parties in the hope of obtaining better grades. The nature of contract cheating has changed over the years with current pervasive internet culture has made it much easier to cheat, hence there is a global rise in contract cheating activities. If unchecked, this poses a significant threat to the global higher education sector, where assessments are one of the established fundamental ways by which student learning is assessed. The purpose of this study is to critically review the existing Academic Integrity policies of Queensland, Australia public universities, as well as existing literature and document the contract cheating definition adopted. The review suggests a range of definition of contract cheating is available in the literature, with only three Queensland universities (out of seven in total) explicitly identifying and defining contract cheating in their policy documents. An evaluation of these definitions suggests that they miss out on important characteristics of cheating, such as cheating may occur without monetary transactions or even done by students' own friends and family members. In view of the above, a revised definition is presented, and its merit discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1482
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university staff
    Harper, Rowena
    Bretag, T.
    Ellis, C.
    Newton, P.
    Rozenberg, P.
    Saddiqui, S.
    van Haeringen, K.
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (11) : 1857 - 1873
  • [2] Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
    Stoesz, Brenda M.
    Eaton, Sarah Elaine
    Miron, Jennifer
    Thacker, Emma J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRITY, 2019, 15 (01)
  • [3] Cheaters on Twitter: an analysis of engagement approaches of contract cheating services
    Amigud, Alexander
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (03) : 692 - 705
  • [4] Spanish contract cheating website marketing through search engine advertisements
    Comas-Forgas, Ruben
    Sureda-Negre, Jaume
    Morey-Lopez, Merce
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (07) : 1035 - 1047
  • [5] Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
    Brenda M. Stoesz
    Sarah Elaine Eaton
    Jennifer Miron
    Emma J. Thacker
    International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15
  • [6] Interinstitutional perspectives on contract cheating: a qualitative narrative exploration from Canada
    Eaton, Sarah Elaine
    Chibry, Nancy
    Toye, Margaret A.
    Rossi, Silvia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRITY, 2019, 15 (01)
  • [7] Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship
    Bretag, Tracey
    Harper, Rowena
    Burton, Michael
    Ellis, Cath
    Newton, Philip
    van Haeringen, Karen
    Saddiqui, Sonia
    Rozenberg, Pearl
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (05) : 676 - 691
  • [8] Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students
    Bretag, Tracey
    Harper, Rowena
    Burton, Michael
    Ellis, Cath
    Newton, Philip
    Rozenberg, Pearl
    Saddiqui, Sonia
    van Haeringen, Karen
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (11) : 1837 - 1856
  • [9] DETECTING PLAGIARISM AND CONTRACT CHEATING: NEW ACADEMIC INTEGRITY CHALLENGES
    Sousa-Silva, Rui
    PLAGIARISM ACROSS EUROPE AND BEYOND 2017, 2017, : 125 - 125
  • [10] Contract cheating: a new challenge for academic honesty?
    Walker, Mary
    Townley, Cynthia
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2012, 10 (01) : 27 - 44