The link between suggestibility, compliance, and false confessions: A review using experimental and field studies

被引:15
作者
Otgaar, Henry [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schell-Leugers, Jennifer Maria [1 ]
Howe, Mark L. [1 ,2 ]
Vilar, Alejandra De La Fuente [1 ,4 ]
Houben, Sanne T. L. [1 ,3 ]
Merckelbach, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London, England
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Law, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Psychol, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
compliance; false confessions; individual differences; suggestibility; INTERROGATIVE SUGGESTIBILITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MEMORY DISTRUST; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGY; CONSEQUENCES; PLAUSIBILITY; TRUE; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/acp.3788
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Expert witnesses and scholars sometimes disagree on whether suggestibility and compliance are related to people's tendency to falsely confess. Hence, the principal aim of this review was to amass the available evidence on the link between suggestibility and compliance and false confessions. We reviewed experimental data in which false confessions were experimentally evoked and suggestibility and compliance were measured. Furthermore, we reviewed field data of potential false confessions and their relationship with suggestibility and compliance. These diverse databases converge to the same conclusion. We unequivocally found that high levels of suggestibility (and to a lesser extent compliance) were associated with an increased vulnerability to falsely confess. Suggestibility measurements might be informative for expert witnesses who must evaluate the false confession potential in legal cases.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 455
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Dna exonerations in the united states
[2]   The roles of interrogation, perception, and individual differences in producing compliant false confessions [J].
Blair, J. P. .
PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2007, 13 (02) :173-186
[3]   I hit the Shift-key and then the computer crashed: Children and false admissions [J].
Candel, I ;
Merckelbach, H ;
Loyen, S ;
Reyskens, H .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 38 (06) :1381-1387
[4]  
Chojnacki D.E., 2008, Arizona State Law Journal, V40, P1
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[6]  
de Ruiter C D., 2015, Forensic psychological assessment in practice: Case studies
[7]   Suspect personality, police interrogations, and false confessions: Maybe it is not just the situation [J].
Forrest, KD ;
Wadkins, TA ;
Larson, BA .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 40 (03) :621-628
[8]   A psychometric evaluation of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales: Problems associated with measuring suggestibility as a difference score composite [J].
Gignac, Gilles E. ;
Powell, Martine B. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 46 (02) :88-93
[9]  
Gudjonsson G., 2003, PSYCHOL INTERROGATIO
[10]  
Gudjonsson G.H., 1992, PSYCHOL INTERROGATIO