The Effect of Manual Removal of Placenta Immediately after Foaling on Subsequent Fertility Parameters in the Mare

被引:8
作者
Cuervo-Arango, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Newcombe, John R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cardenal Herrera CEU, Fac Ciencias Expt & Salud, Dpto Med & Cirugia Anim, Moncada, Spain
[2] Equine Fertil Clin, Brownhills WS8 6LS, W Midlands, England
关键词
Retained placenta; Mare; Manual removal; Fertility; POSTOPERATIVE PERITONEAL-LAVAGE; HORSES; PREVENTION; ADHESIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jevs.2009.10.004
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Retained placenta is considered to be a common problem in postpartum mares. The incidence varies from 6% to 54% depending on the breed, with higher incidence in heavy draught mares than in light-weight mares. Retained placenta has been linked to lower postpartum, oxytocin concentration, impaired uterine involution, and dystocia. The objective Of this study,vas to assess the effect of early manual removal of placenta immediately postpartum on subsequent fertility parameters (development of free intrauterine fluid, inflammatory status of endometrium, and on pregnancy rates) and to compare them with mares with spontaneous expulsion of placenta. A total of 29 mares, mainly Irish draught, were closely monitored during foaling by closed circuit television and allocated to two groups: (1) mares that expelled the placenta spontaneously within 3 hours of foaling; and (2) mares that were cleansed manually immediately after foal delivery. All mares were examined and scanned 5 and 9 days postpartum, and free intrauterine fluid was recorded; endometrial swabs were taken 9 days postpartum for endometrial cytology and culture. None of the fertility parameters analyzed showed statistical difference between groups 1 and 2. Therefore, it can be concluded that early manual removal of placenta has no detrimental effects on subsequent fertility of mares and, therefore, can be recommended when a veterinarian attends a foaling.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 781
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Open peritoneal drainage in horses with experimentally induced peritonitis [J].
Chase, JP ;
Beard, WL ;
Bertone, AL ;
Goltz, K .
VETERINARY SURGERY, 1996, 25 (03) :189-194
[2]  
DABAREINER R, 1998, LARGE ANIMAL INTERNA, P742
[3]   Treatment of peritonitis [J].
Davis, JL .
VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-EQUINE PRACTICE, 2003, 19 (03) :765-+
[4]  
Easter JL, 1997, AM J VET RES, V58, P1166
[5]   Prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal adhesions [J].
Eggleston, RB ;
Mueller, POE .
VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-EQUINE PRACTICE, 2003, 19 (03) :741-+
[6]   Evaluation of postoperative peritoneal lavage in standing horses for prevention of experimentally induced abdominal adhesions [J].
Hague, BA ;
Honnas, CM ;
Berridge, BR ;
Easter, JL .
VETERINARY SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) :122-126
[7]  
HARDY J, 2006, EQUINE SURG, P508
[8]  
HAWKINS JF, 1993, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V203, P284
[9]   Study of the short- and long-term outcomes of 65 horses with peritonitis [J].
Henderson, I. S. F. ;
Mair, T. S. ;
Keen, J. A. ;
Shaw, D. J. ;
McGorum, B. C. .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2008, 163 (10) :293-+
[10]  
Mair T., 2002, MANUAL EQUINE GASTRO, P322