How You Move Is What You See: Action Planning Biases Selection in Visual Search

被引:92
|
作者
Wykowska, Agnieszka [1 ,3 ]
Schuboe, Anna [1 ]
Hommel, Bernhard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Expt Psychol, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Leiden Univ, Inst Psychol, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Munich, Dept Psychol, D-80802 Munich, Germany
关键词
action-related biases on perception; action planning; visual selection; SINGLETON FEATURE TARGETS; LATERAL PREMOTOR CORTEX; TOP-DOWN; POP-OUT; NEURAL MECHANISMS; EVENT FILES; ATTENTION; STIMULUS; PERCEPTION; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0016798
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Three experiments investigated the impact of planning and preparing a manual grasping or pointing movement on feature detection in a visual search task. The authors hypothesized that action planning may prime perceptual dimensions that provide information for the open parameters of that action. Indeed, preparing for grasping facilitated detection of size targets while preparing for pointing facilitated detection of luminance targets. Following the Theory of Event Coding (Hommel, Musseler, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2001b), the authors suggest that perceptual dimensions may be intentionally weighted with respect to an intended action. More interesting, the action-related influences were observed only when participants searched for a predefined target. This implies that action-related weighting is not independent from task-relevance weighting. To account for our findings, the authors suggest an integrative model of visual search that incorporates input from action-planning processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1755 / 1769
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do you see what I see? How social differences influence mindreading
    Spaulding, Shannon
    SYNTHESE, 2018, 195 (09) : 4009 - 4030
  • [22] What you feel influences what you see: The role of affective feelings in resolving binocular rivalry
    Anderson, Eric
    Siegel, Erika H.
    Barrett, Lisa Feldman
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (04) : 856 - 860
  • [23] What you see is what you expect: rapid scene understanding benefits from prior experience
    Greene, Michelle R.
    Botros, Abraham P.
    Beck, Diane M.
    Li Fei-Fei
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2015, 77 (04) : 1239 - 1251
  • [24] What You See Depends on What You Hear: Temporal Averaging and Crossmodal Integration
    Chen, Lihan
    Zhou, Xiaolin
    Mueller, Hermann J.
    Shi, Zhuanghua
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2018, 147 (12) : 1851 - 1864
  • [25] Do you see what I see? How expertise and a decision-maker role influence the recognition and selection of novel ideas
    Beretta, Michela
    Deichmann, Dirk
    Frederiksen, Lars
    Stam, Daan
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2025, 54 (01)
  • [26] What You See Is (not) What You Get: A VR Framework For Correcting Robot Errors
    Wozniak, Maciej K.
    Stower, Rebecca
    Jensfelt, Patric
    Pereira, Andre
    COMPANION OF THE ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2023, 2023, : 243 - 247
  • [27] What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation
    McSorley, Eugene
    Morriss, Jayne
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2017, 31 (01) : 168 - 174
  • [28] Now You See It, Now You Don't: Visual Illusions in Radiology
    Buckle, Christopher E.
    Udawatta, Viyan
    Straus, Christopher M.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2013, 33 (07) : 2087 - 2102
  • [29] Do you feel what you see? Multimodal perception in virtual reality
    Hepperle, Daniel
    Woelfel, Matthias
    VRST'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ACM SYMPOSIUM ON VIRTUAL REALITY SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017,
  • [30] You can see what 'I' means
    Matey, Jennifer
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2013, 162 (01) : 57 - 70