Outcomes in prediabetes vs. diabetes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous intervention

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Yong Hoon [1 ]
Her, Ae-Young [1 ]
Jeong, Myung Ho [2 ]
Kim, Byeong-Keuk [3 ]
Hong, Sung-Jin [3 ]
Kim, Seunghwan [4 ]
Ahn, Chul-Min [3 ]
Kim, Jung-Sun [3 ]
Ko, Young-Guk [3 ]
Choi, Donghoon [3 ]
Hong, Myeong-Ki [3 ]
Jang, Yangsoo [3 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, 156 Baengnyeong Rd, Chunchon 24289, Gangwon Provinc, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Gwangju, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Severance Cardiovasc Hosp, Div Cardiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Inje Univ, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Div Cardiol, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
关键词
diabetes; multivessel disease; non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; prediabetes; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTOR; MELLITUS; MULTIVESSEL; MORTALITY; METAANALYSIS; DYSFUNCTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/MCA.0000000000000969
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The comparative long-term clinical outcomes between patients with prediabetes and diabetes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) who were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well known. We therefore compared the 2-year clinical outcomes in such patients. Methods A total of 2963 patients with NSTEMI and MVD [normoglycemia (group A, n = 629), prediabetes (group B, n = 802), and diabetes (group C, n = 1532)] were evaluated. The primary outcomes were the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was stent thrombosis. Results The cumulative incidence of MACE as well as for death or MI in group B and C were similar when compared to each other. However, they (P = 0.048 and P = 0.017, respectively and P = 0.022 and P = 0.001, respectively) were significantly higher than in group A. The cumulative incidence of all-cause death in group B (P = 0.042) and all-cause death and cardiac death in group C (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively) were significantly higher than in group A. However, those of all-cause death, cardiac death, Re-MI, any repeat revascularization, and ST were not significantly different between groups B and C. Conclusion In this study, patients with NSTEMI and MVD who underwent successful implantation of newer-generation DES and were prediabetic had worse outcomes compared to normoglycemics and comparable to those with diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 223
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Percutaneous Intervention for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Within the Therapeutic Time Window for Acute Myocardial Infarction Reply
    Ting, Henry H.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 171 (10) : 952 - 952
  • [22] Management of non-ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Van Horn, Stephen E.
    Maniu, Calin V.
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 91 (04) : 683 - +
  • [23] Is The Diagnosis ST-Segment Elevation or Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
    Tsutsumi, Katsuhiko
    Tsukahara, Kengo
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (23) : 2715 - 2717
  • [24] Short- and Long-term Outcomes Among Black vs. White Patients with Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Mathews, Robin
    Chen, Anita Y.
    Chin, Chee T.
    Wang, Tracy Y.
    Thomas, Kevin L.
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [25] Quality of care by classification of myocardial infarction - Treatment patterns for ST-segment elevation vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Roe, MT
    Parsons, LS
    Pollack, CV
    Canto, JG
    Barron, HV
    Every, NR
    Rogers, WJ
    Peterson, ED
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (14) : 1630 - 1636
  • [26] Outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafts surgery
    Shoaib, A.
    Kinnaird, T.
    Curzen, N.
    Ludman, P.
    Belder, M. D.
    Rashid, M.
    Kwok, C. S.
    Nolan, J.
    Zaman, A.
    Mamas, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 738 - 738
  • [27] Culprit vessel vs. immediate multivessel vs. out-of-hospital staged intervention for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease
    Wang, Chen
    Lang, Jiachun
    Zhang, Jingxia
    Hu, Yuecheng
    Han, Chuyi
    Xu, Rongdi
    Wu, Jikun
    Liu, Chunwei
    Li, Wenyu
    Li, Tingting
    Wei, Ao
    Qi, Wei
    Jin, Dongxia
    Cong, Hongliang
    Wang, Le
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [28] Assessment of serum phenylalanine and tyrosine isomers in patients with ST-segment elevation vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Al-Sadoon, Ied
    Wittmann, Istvan
    Kun, Szilard
    Ahmann, Mercedesz
    Konyi, Attila
    Verzar, Zsofia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2021, 35 (02)
  • [29] Does time of symptom onset to percutaneous coronary intervention affect in-hospital outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
    Khanal, S
    DeFranco, AC
    Smith, DE
    O'Donnell, MJ
    Hill, T
    Patel, K
    D'Haem, C
    Share, D
    Chandra, H
    Moscucci, M
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 538 - 538
  • [30] Antithrombotic Strategy in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Insights From the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry
    Lopes, Renato D.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Chen, Anita Y.
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Wang, Tracy Y.
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Magid, David J.
    Ho, P. Michael
    Wiviott, Stephen D.
    Scirica, Benjamin M.
    Alexander, Karen P.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (06) : 669 - 677