Verification of multileaf collimator leaf positions using an electronic portal imaging device

被引:35
作者
Samant, SS [1 ]
Zheng, W
Parra, NA
Chandler, J
Gopal, A
Wu, J
Jain, J
Zhu, YP
Sontag, M
机构
[1] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Memphis, TN 38015 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Sch Biomed Engn, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
multileaf collimation (MLC); EPID; verification; leaf position; edge detection;
D O I
10.1118/1.1515760
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
An automated method is presented for determining individual leaf positions of the Siemens dual focus multileaf collimator (MLC) using the Siemens BEAMVIEW(PLUS) electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Leaf positions are computed with an error of 0.6 mm at one standard deviation (sigma) using separate computations of pixel dimensions, image distortion, and radiation center. The pixel dimensions are calculated by superimposing the film image of a graticule with the corresponding EPID image. A spatial correction is used to compensate for the optical distortions of the EPID, reducing the mean distortion from 3.5 pixels (uncorrected) per localized x-ray marker to 2 pixels (1 mm) for a rigid rotation and 1 pixel for a third degree polynomial warp. A correction for a nonuniform dosimetric response across the field of view of the EPID images is not necessary due to the sharp intensity gradients across leaf edges. The radiation center, calculated from the average of the geometric centers of a square field at 0degrees and 180degrees collimator angles, is independent of graticule placement error. Its measured location on the EPID image was stable to within 1 pixel based on 3 weeks of repeated extensions/retractions of the EPID. The MLC leaf positions determined from the EPID images agreed to within a pixel of the corresponding values measured using film and ionization chamber. Several edge detection algorithms were tested: contour, Sobel, Roberts, Prewitt, Laplace, morphological, and Canny. These agreed with each other to within less than or equal to1.2 pixels for the in-air EPID images. Using a test pattern, individual MLC leaves were found to be typically within 1 mm of the corresponding record-and-verify values, with a maximum difference of 1.8 mm, and standard deviations of <0.3 mm in the daily reproducibility. This method presents a fast, automatic, and accurate alternative to using film or a light field for the verification and calibration of the MLC. (C) 2002 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2900 / 2912
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   AUTOMATIC VERIFICATION OF RADIATION-FIELD SHAPE USING DIGITAL PORTAL IMAGES [J].
BIJHOLD, J ;
GILHUIJS, KGA ;
VANHERK, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (04) :1007-1014
[2]   Optimal phosphor thickness for portal imaging [J].
Bissonnette, JP ;
Cunningham, IA ;
Munro, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (06) :803-814
[3]  
BOYER A, 2001, 72 AAPM TASK GROUP 5
[5]  
CASTELMAN KR, 1996, DIGITAL IMAGE PROCES, P467
[6]   Verification of segmented beam delivery using a commercial electronic portal imaging device [J].
Curtin-Savard, AJ ;
Podgorsak, EB .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (05) :737-742
[7]  
Davis L.S., 1975, Comput. Graph. Image Process., V4, P248
[8]   A portal image alignment and patient setup verification procedure using moments and correlation techniques [J].
Dong, L ;
Boyer, AL .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (04) :697-723
[9]   METHODS FOR FULLY AUTOMATED VERIFICATION OF PATIENT SET-UP IN EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY WITH POLYGON SHAPED FIELDS [J].
EILERTSEN, K ;
SKRETTING, A ;
TENNVASSAS, TL .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (06) :993-1012
[10]   Automatic detection of single MLC leaf positions with corrections for penumbral effects and portal imager dose rate characteristics [J].
Eilertsen, K .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (02) :313-334