Weighted win loss approach for analyzing prioritized outcomes

被引:31
|
作者
Luo, Xiaodong [1 ]
Qiu, Junshan [2 ]
Bai, Steven [2 ]
Tian, Hong [3 ]
机构
[1] Sanofi US, Res & Dev, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 USA
[2] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Div Biometr 1, Off Biostat, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[3] Janssen Res & Dev, Raritan, NJ 08869 USA
关键词
clinical trials; composite end points; contribution index; prioritized outcomes; weighted win ratio; variance estimation; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RATIO APPROACH;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7284
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To analyze prioritized outcomes, Buyse (2010) and Pocock etal. (2012) proposed the win loss approach. In this paper, we first study the relationship between the win loss approach and the traditional survival analysis on the time to the first event. We then propose the weighted win loss statistics to improve the efficiency of the unweighted methods. A closed-form variance estimator of the weighted win loss statistics is derived to facilitate hypothesis testing and study design. We also calculated the contribution index to better interpret the results of the weighted win loss approach. Simulation studies and real data analysis demonstrated the characteristics of the proposed statistics. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2452 / 2465
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach outcomes differ among emerging adults and adolescents
    Smith, Douglas C.
    Godley, Susan H.
    Godley, Mark D.
    Dennis, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2011, 41 (04) : 422 - 430
  • [42] A weighted estimating equation approach for inhomogeneous spatial point processes
    Guan, Yongtao
    Shen, Ye
    BIOMETRIKA, 2010, 97 (04) : 867 - 880
  • [43] A new modeling and inference approach for the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial outcomes
    Yang, Song
    Ambrosius, Walter T.
    Fine, Lawrence J.
    Bress, Adam P.
    Cushman, William C.
    Raj, Dominic S.
    Rehman, Shakaib
    Tamariz, Leonardo
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 15 (03) : 305 - 312
  • [44] A natural lead-in approach to response-adaptive allocation for continuous outcomes
    Donahue, Erin
    Sabo, Roy T.
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2021, 20 (03) : 563 - 572
  • [45] People first: a participatory community approach on patient-reported outcomes in tuberculosis
    Martin, Dulce
    Barbosa, Pedro
    Ramos, Joao Pedro
    Vieira, Mariana
    Duarte, Raquel
    BREATHE, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [46] A Novel Approach to Evaluate Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment Outcomes Using Pattern Identification
    Berle, Christine A.
    Cobbin, Deirdre
    Smith, Narelle
    Zaslawski, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2010, 16 (04) : 357 - 367
  • [47] A principal stratification approach to estimating the effect of continuing treatment after observing early outcomes
    Schnell, Patrick M.
    Baumgartner, Richard
    Mt-Isa, Shahrul
    Svetnik, Vladimir
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2022, 71 (05) : 1065 - 1084
  • [48] Weight loss at your fingertips: personalized nutrition with fasting glucose and insulin using a novel statistical approach
    Ritz, Christian
    Astrup, Arne
    Larsen, Thomas M.
    Hjorth, Mads F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 73 (11) : 1529 - 1535
  • [49] Data anomalies and apparent reporting errors in 'Randomized controlled trial testing weight loss and abdominal obesity outcomes of moxibustion'
    Mestre, Luis M.
    Dickinson, Stephanie L.
    Golzarri-Arroyo, Lilian
    Brown, Andrew W.
    Allison, David B.
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [50] Data anomalies and apparent reporting errors in ‘Randomized controlled trial testing weight loss and abdominal obesity outcomes of moxibustion’
    Luis M. Mestre
    Stephanie L. Dickinson
    Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo
    Andrew W. Brown
    David B. Allison
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 19