Autogenous bone block grafting provides facial implant tissue stability long-term

被引:13
作者
Verdugo, Fernando [1 ]
Uribarri, Agurne [2 ]
D'Addona, Antonio [3 ]
机构
[1] VA Hosp, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Dept Periodont, Altadena, CA USA
[2] Univ Basque Country, Sch Med & Odontol, Dept Oral Med, Leioa, Spain
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Odontol Clin, Rome, Italy
关键词
bone graft; bone regeneration; bone transplant; endosseous implants; gingival recession; periodontal attachment loss; ridge augmentation; VOLUME MAINTENANCE; GINGIVAL RECESSION; FOLLOW-UP; REGENERATION; RECONSTRUCTION; MEMBRANES; PREVALENCE; PERIOSTEUM; DEFECTS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12476
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundMucosal recession (MR) and bone loss can compromise anterior implant esthetics. PurposeTo evaluate tissue stability and clinical outcomes of anterior implants augmented with autogenous block transplants long-term. Materials and MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional clinical study analyzed facial tissue recession of anterior implants augmented with autogenous bone blocks and compared them to adjacent teeth in forty patients 52 months post-augmentation. Clinical parameters, MR and implant transparency, were assessed at delivery and follow-up. The hypothesis is that the facial mucosa of augmented implant sites is more resistant to trauma than the gingival margins of adjacent teeth. ResultsTeeth were seven times more likely to present a facial recession than adjacent augmented implants at 52-month follow-up (RR: 7; P<.001; 95%CI: 2.7-18.0). Augmented implant sites were six times more likely to present no-tissue-recession than adjacent teeth (RR: 6.2; P<.001; 95%CI: 2.4-15.7). Mean tooth facial tissue recession was significantly higher than adjacent implants, 1.181.05 mm (range: 0-3.5 mm) vs. 0.06 +/- 0.2 mm (95%CI: 0.8-1.5; P<.0001). Thick biotype teeth were 2 times more resistant to recession than thin biotype teeth (RR: 2.03; P=.03; 95%CI: 1.2-3.5). Implant success rates were 100%. Lack of transparency and MR at facial implant sites lasted an average of 52 months and up to 144 without signs of inflammation or pocket formation regardless of the individual's biotype. Facial bone thicknesses of 2.2 mm seem optimal for tissue stability. ConclusionsAutogenous bone block augmentation with staged implant placement seems to be a predictable, short-healing, reconstructive protocol in the esthetic zone maintaining stable peri-implant tissues long-term. Implant augmented sites seem more resistant to develop a recession than adjacent teeth.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 485
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Healing of onlay mandibular bone grafts covered with collagen membrane or bovine bone substitutes:: A microscopical and immunohistochemical study in the sheep [J].
Adeyemo, W. L. ;
Reuther, T. ;
Bloch, W. ;
Korkmaz, Y. ;
Fischer, J. H. ;
Zoeller, J. E. ;
Kuebler, A. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 37 (07) :651-659
[2]   Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Stability in Implants Placed Simultaneously Versus Delayed with Intraoral Block Bone Grafts in Horizontal Defects: A Retrospective Case Series Study [J].
Aloy-Prosper, Amparo ;
Penarrocha-Oltra, David ;
Penarrocha-Diago, Maria ;
Camacho-Alonso, Fabio ;
Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (01) :133-141
[3]   Clinical outcome of autogenous bone blocks or guided bone regeneration with e-PTFE membranes for the reconstruction of narrow edentulous ridges [J].
Chiapasco, M ;
Abati, S ;
Romeo, E ;
Vogel, G .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (04) :278-288
[4]   Failures in Jaw Reconstructive Surgery with Autogenous On lay Bone Grafts for Pre-implant Purposes: Incidence, Prevention and Management of Complications [J].
Chiapasco, Matteo ;
Zaniboni, Marco .
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 23 (01) :1-+
[5]   The effect of different membranes on onlay bone graft success in the dog mandible [J].
Dongieux, JW ;
Block, MS ;
Morris, G ;
Gardiner, D ;
Dean, K .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1998, 86 (02) :145-151
[6]   Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements [J].
Evans, Christopher D. J. ;
Chen, Stephen T. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (01) :73-80
[7]  
Grunder U, 2005, INT J PERIODONT REST, V25, P113
[8]  
Jemt T, 1997, INT J PERIODONT REST, V17, P327
[9]   AUTOGENOUS MANDIBULAR BONE-GRAFTS AND OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SEVERELY ATROPHIED MAXILLA - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
JENSEN, J ;
SINDETPEDERSEN, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 49 (12) :1277-1287
[10]   Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants:: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI® Dental Implant System [J].
Karoussis, IK ;
Brägger, U ;
Salvi, GE ;
Bürgin, W ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (01) :8-17