Time Until Emergence of HIV Test Reactivity Following Infection With HIV-1: Implications for Interpreting Test Results and Retesting After Exposure

被引:80
作者
Delaney, Kevin P. [1 ]
Hanson, Debra L. [1 ]
Masciotra, Silvina [1 ]
Ethridge, Steven F. [1 ]
Wesolowski, Laura [1 ]
Owen, Sherry Michele [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div HIV AIDS Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr HIV AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD & TB Preven, Off Director, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
HIV immunoassays; HIV eclipse period; RNA nucleic acid test; window period of infection; HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS; MISSED OPPORTUNITIES; ORAL FLUID; RAPID TEST; DIAGNOSIS; US; SEROCONVERSION; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciw666
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Understanding the period of time between an exposure resulting in infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and when a test can reliably detect the presence of that infection, that is, the test window period, may benefit testing programs and clinicians in counseling patients about when the clinician and the patient can be confident a suspected exposure did not result in HIV infection. Methods. We evaluated the intervals between reactivity of the Aptima HIV-1 RNA test (Aptima) and 20 US Food and Drug Administration-approved HIV immunoassays using 222 longitudinally collected plasma specimens from HIV-1 seroconverters from the United States. Using interval-censored survival and binomial regression approaches a multi-model framework was implemented to estimate the relative emergence of test reactivity, referred to here as an inter-test reactivity interval (ITRI). We then combined ITRI results with simulated data for the eclipse period, the time between exposure and detection of HIV virus by Aptima, to estimate the window period for each test. Results. The estimated ITRIs were shorter with each new class of HIV tests, ranging from 5.9 to 24.8 days. The 99th percentiles of the window period probability distribution ranged from 44 days for laboratory screening tests that detect both antigen and antibody to 65 days for the Western blot test. Conclusions. Our directly comparable estimates of the emergence of reactivity for 20 immunoassays are valuable to testing providers for interpreting negative HIV test results obtained shortly after exposure, and for counseling individuals on when to retest after an exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], COMPL LIST DON SCREE
  • [2] [Anonymous], APT HIV 1 RNA QUAL A
  • [3] [Anonymous], IMPL HIV TEST NONCL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, UPDATED GUIDELINES A
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016 HIV DIAGN C ATL
  • [6] Innate immunity in acute HIV-1 infection
    Borrow, Persephone
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS, 2011, 6 (05) : 353 - 363
  • [7] Detection of Acute HIV Infection: We Can't Close the Window
    Branson, Bernard M.
    Stekler, Joanne D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 205 (04) : 521 - 524
  • [8] Convergence assessment techniques for Markov chain Monte Carlo
    Brooks, SP
    Roberts, GO
    [J]. STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 1998, 8 (04) : 319 - 335
  • [9] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, LAB TEST DIAGN HIV I
  • [10] Prevention of HIV-1 Infection with Early Antiretroviral Therapy
    Cohen, Myron S.
    Chen, Ying Q.
    McCauley, Marybeth
    Gamble, Theresa
    Hosseinipour, Mina C.
    Kumarasamy, Nagalingeswaran
    Hakim, James G.
    Kumwenda, Johnstone
    Grinsztejn, Beatriz
    Pilotto, Jose H. S.
    Godbole, Sheela V.
    Mehendale, Sanjay
    Chariyalertsak, Suwat
    Santos, Breno R.
    Mayer, Kenneth H.
    Hoffman, Irving F.
    Eshleman, Susan H.
    Piwowar-Manning, Estelle
    Wang, Lei
    Makhema, Joseph
    Mills, Lisa A.
    de Bruyn, Guy
    Sanne, Ian
    Eron, Joseph
    Gallant, Joel
    Havlir, Diane
    Swindells, Susan
    Ribaudo, Heather
    Elharrar, Vanessa
    Burns, David
    Taha, Taha E.
    Nielsen-Saines, Karin
    Celentano, David
    Essex, Max
    Fleming, Thomas R.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (06) : 493 - 505