Nitrate removal in surface-flow constructed wetlands treating dilute agricultural runoff in the lower Yakima Basin, Washington

被引:74
作者
Beutel, Marc W. [1 ]
Newton, Crystal D. [2 ]
Brouillard, Elaine S. [3 ]
Watts, Richard J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ecol Engn Grp, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Roza Sunnyside Board Joint Control, Sunnyside, WA 98944 USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
Constructed treatment wetland; Agricultural runoff; Nitrate; Denitrification; DENITRIFICATION; NITROGEN; VEGETATION; RETENTION; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.07.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Constructed treatment wetlands (CTWs) have been used effectively to treat a range of wastewaters and non-point sources contaminated with nitrogen(N). But documented long-term case studies of CTWs treating dilute nitrate-dominated agricultural runoff are limited. This study presents an analysis of four years of water quality data for a 1.6-ha surface-flow CTW treating irrigation return flows in Yakima Basin in central Washington. The CTW consisted of a sedimentation basin followed by two surface-flow wetlands in parallel, each with three cells. Inflow typically contained 1-3 mg-N/L nitrate and <0.4 mg-N/L total Kjeldahl N (TKN). Hydraulic loading was fairly constant, ranging from around 125 cm/d in the sedimentation basin to 12 cm/d in the treatment wetlands. Concentration removal efficiencies for nitrate averaged 34% in the sedimentation basin and 90-93% in the treatment wetlands. Total IN removal efficiencies averaged 21% and 57-63% in the sedimentation basin and treatment wetlands, respectively. Area-based first-order removal rate constants for nitrate in the wetlands averaged 142-149 m/yr. Areal removal rates for nitrate in treatment wetlands averaged 139-146 mg-N/m(2)/d. Outflow from the CTW typically contained <0.1 mg-N/L nitrate and <0.6 mg-N/L TKN. Rates of nitrate loss in wetlands were highly seasonal, generally peaking in the summer months (June-August). Nitrate loss rates also correlated significantly with water temperature (positively) and dissolved oxygen (negatively). Based on the modified Arrhenius relationship, 0 for nitrate loss in the wetlands was 1.05-1.09. The CTW also significantly affected temperature and dissolved oxygen concentration in waters flowing through the system. On average, the sedimentation basin caused an increase in temperature (+1.7 degrees C) and dissolved oxygen (+1.5 mg/L); in contrast the wetlands caused a decrease in temperature (-1.6 degrees C) and dissolved oxygen (-5.0mg/L). Results show that CTWs with surface-flow wetlands can be extremely effective at polishing dilute non-point sources, particularly in semi-arid environments where warm temperatures and low oxygen levels in treatment wetland water promote biological denitrification. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1538 / 1546
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], VERH INT VEREIN LIMN
[2]  
[Anonymous], EST NAT OCC EXP NITR
[3]  
APHA/AWWA/WEF, 2017, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, V23rd
[4]  
Bachand PAM, 2000, ECOL ENG, V14, P17
[5]  
Bachand PAM, 2000, ECOL ENG, V14, P9
[6]  
DAIGLE D, 2003, MULTINATI MONIT, V24, P147
[7]  
Firestone M, 1982, AGRONOMY, P289, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGR0NM0N0GR22.C8
[8]   Balancing wildlife needs and nitrate removal in constructed wetlands: The case of the Irvine Ranch Water District's San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary [J].
Fleming-Singer, MS ;
Horne, AJ .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (02) :147-166
[9]  
Horne AJ, 2005, BIOREMEDIATION OF AQUATIC AND TERRESTIAL ECOSYSTEMS, P329
[10]   Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N&P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences [J].
Howarth, RW ;
Billen, G ;
Swaney, D ;
Townsend, A ;
Jaworski, N ;
Lajtha, K ;
Downing, JA ;
Elmgren, R ;
Caraco, N ;
Jordan, T ;
Berendse, F ;
Freney, J ;
Kudeyarov, V ;
Murdoch, P ;
Zhu, ZL .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 35 (01) :75-139