The effect of prosthesis design on vibration of the reconstructed ossicular chain: A comparative finite element analysis of four prostheses

Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that the differences in the bioacoustic performance of ossicular replacement prosthesis designs, and insertion positions, could be quantified using finite element analysis. Background: Many designs of prosthesis are available for middle ear surgery. The materials used, and the shape of the implants, differ widely. Advances in computer simulation technologies offer the possibility of replicating the in vivo behavior of the different prostheses. If this can be achieved, insight into the design attributes required for improved biofunctionality may be gained. Methods: Micro-computed tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging were used to obtain geometric information that was translated into a finite element model of the outer and middle ear. The forced frequency response across the hearing range of the normal middle ear was compared with the middle ear reconstructed with partial and total ossicular replacement prostheses. Results: The amplitude of vibration of the footplate was more similar to that of the normal ear when a Kurz total ossicular replacement prosthesis was implanted than when a Xomed total ossicular replacement prosthesis was implanted. This may be attributed to the latter's titanium link. Partial ossicular replacement prostheses were stiffest and had lower umbo vibrations and higher stapedial footplate vibrations. In all cases but one, the vibration of the prostheses had resonances that caused the vibration of the stapes footplate to be noticeably different from normal. Conclusion: The authors confirmed the hypothesis that finite element modeling can be used to predict the differences in the response of ossicular replacement prostheses. This study shows that computer simulation can potentially be used to test or optimize the vibroacoustic characteristics of middle ear implants.