Barriers to implementing the group B streptococcal prevention guidelines

被引:4
作者
Cárdenas, V
Davis, RL
Hasselquist, MB
Zavitkovsky, A
Schuchat, A
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
[3] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Resp Dis Branch, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2002年 / 29卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00203.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Group B streptococcal disease is the leading cause of neonatal sepsis in the United States. We assessed predictors of compliance with the consensus guidelines for perinatal group B streptococcus disease prevention at two Group Health Cooperative hospitals. Methods: A descriptive and cohort analysis was conducted of failure to comply with the screening-based approach to group B streptococcus prevention among singleton birth pregnancies in two Group Health Cooperative hospitals, September 1, 1996 to December 31, 1997. We studied determinants of,failure to screen pregnant women for group B streptococcus at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation and failure to deliver intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to Group B streptococcus-positive women. Results: Nearly 28 percent of 1969 women delivering at two Group Health Cooperative hospitals were not screened appropriately for group B streptococcus. Women who were not screened properly were more likely to be in their teens, A short length of hospital stay before delivery was the strongest predictor of the lack of administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to infected multiparas at delivery. Group B streptococcus-positive women without pregnancy complications were less likely to receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis than infected women with complications. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that to improve group B streptococcus disease prevention, screening efforts should focus on teenage women, and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis delivery efforts should be aimed at low-risk women with precipitous labor.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 290
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PREV EARL ONS GROUP
  • [2] Introduction of the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention group B streptococcal prevention guideline at a large West Coast health maintenance organization
    Davis, RL
    Hasselquist, MB
    Cardenas, V
    Zerr, DM
    Kramer, J
    Zavitkovsky, A
    Schuchat, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (04) : 603 - 610
  • [3] Concepts and controversies in the management of group B streptococcus during pregnancy
    Glantz, JC
    Kedley, KE
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1998, 25 (01): : 45 - 53
  • [4] Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal infection: Current controversies
    Hager, WD
    Schuchat, A
    Gibbs, R
    Sweet, R
    Mead, P
    Larsen, JW
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (01) : 141 - 145
  • [5] Halsey NA, 1997, PEDIATRICS, V99, P489, DOI 10.1542/peds.99.3.489
  • [6] MACMAHON B, 1970, EPIDEMIOLOGY PRINCIP, P370
  • [7] Group B streptococcal disease in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis
    Schrag, SJ
    Zywicki, S
    Farley, MM
    Reingold, AL
    Harrison, LH
    Lefkowitz, LB
    Hadler, JL
    Danila, R
    Cieslak, PR
    Schuchat, A
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [8] Epidemiology of group B streptococcal disease in the United States: Shifting paradigms
    Schuchat, A
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1998, 11 (03) : 497 - +
  • [9] *STAT CORP, 2001, STAT 2001 STAT STAT
  • [10] TUCKER ME, 2001, FAM FRACTICE NEWS, V32, P1