Barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: Evidence from India

被引:186
|
作者
Tarei, Pradeep Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Chand, Pushpendu [1 ]
Gupta, Himanshu [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Vinod Gupta Sch Management, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
[2] Gandhi Inst Technol & Management, GITAM Inst Management, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Prades, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol ISM Dhanbad, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India
关键词
Sustainable transportation; Battery electric vehicle; Barrier analysis; Decision making framework;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125847
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ever-growing global concern on climate change caused due to vehicular greenhouse gas emission coupled with the depletion of natural resources is driving global economies towards the adoption of alternate fuel technology. Electric vehicles (EV) are positioned as an alternate green and clean technology which potentially can enable the efficient transition to sustainable low-carbon emission transportation system and preservation of natural scare resources. Despite announcing favorable policy measures to encourage EV adoption, the multiplicity of potential barriers with mutual interaction has resisted its penetration in several countries. Though researchers have identified the barriers, but the question "How EV barriers mutually interact among themselves?" has remained largely unanswered in empirical research. Unpacking the relationship within barriers will empower manufacturers, policymakers in strategic planning, and devising suitable measures in controlling the barriers. A hybrid two-phased multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) tools are applied. Firstly, quantitatively BWM (Best-Worst Method) is applied in ranking and prioritizing the important barriers/sub-barriers. The obtained sub barriers are then analyzed to establish a mutual relationship using interpretive structural modelling (ISM). This study has been conducted for the Indian EV context with a focus on technological, infra structural, financial, behavioural, and external barriers. Ranking and prioritization of EV barriers provides a framework for decision-makers to focus on high-priority barriers/sub-barriers in addressing them through preferential resource allocation. The strength of the relationship among barriers to EV adoption was established based on corresponding driving and dependence power. The research finding suggests that EV barriers such as performance and range, the total cost of ownership, shortage of charging infrastructure, lack of consumer awareness about EV technology are critically influential in driving EV adoption. Our research contributes to building an improved understanding of the multifaceted nature of EV barriers and its inter-dependencies in policy and decision making. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Battery electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles, an analysis of alternative powertrains as a mean to decarbonise the transport sector
    Aguilar, P.
    Gross, B.
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 53
  • [32] Sensitivity Analysis of Electric Energy Consumption in Battery Electric Vehicles with Different Electric Motors
    Mavlonov, Jamshid
    Ruzimov, Sanjarbek
    Tonoli, Andrea
    Amati, Nicola
    Mukhitdinov, Akmal
    WORLD ELECTRIC VEHICLE JOURNAL, 2023, 14 (02):
  • [33] Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany
    Bubeck, Steffen
    Tomaschek, Jan
    Fahl, Ulrich
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 50 : 63 - 77
  • [34] Charging Behaviour of Users Utilising Battery Electric Vehicles and Extended Range Electric Vehicles within the Scope of a Field Test
    Dost, P.
    Spichartz, P.
    Sourkounis, C.
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS (ICRERA), 2015, : 1162 - 1167
  • [35] Global Perspectives on and Research Challenges for Electric Vehicles
    Novas, Nuria
    Garcia Salvador, Rosa M.
    Portillo, Francisco
    Robalo, Isabel
    Alcayde, Alfredo
    Fernandez-Ros, Manuel
    Gazquez, Jose A.
    VEHICLES, 2022, 4 (04): : 1246 - 1276
  • [36] STUDY ON GEAR RATIO OF BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES
    Chiver, Olivian
    Burnete, Nicolae
    Sugar, Ioan Radu
    Neamt, Liviu
    Pop, Eleonora
    INGINERIA AUTOMOBILULUI, 2021, (59): : 11 - 16
  • [37] Battery electric vehicles - implications for the driver interface
    Neumann, Isabel
    Krems, Josef F.
    ERGONOMICS, 2016, 59 (03) : 331 - 343
  • [38] Electric Vehicles in Malaysia and Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges
    Veza, Ibham
    Abas, Mohd Azman
    Djamari, Djati Wibowo
    Tamaldin, Noreffendy
    Endrasari, Fitri
    Budiman, Bentang Arief
    Idris, Muhammad
    Opia, Anthony C.
    Juangsa, Firman Bagja
    Aziz, Muhammad
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [39] Exploring the suitability of electric vehicles in the United States
    Onat, Nuri C.
    Noori, Mehdi
    Kucular, Murat
    Zhao, Yang
    Tatari, Omer
    Chester, Mikhail
    ENERGY, 2017, 121 : 631 - 642
  • [40] Life cycle assessment on Battery Electric Vehicles
    Zhang, Yaowei
    Liao, Yanfen
    Liu, Guicai
    Hu, Shanchao
    Ma, Xiaoqian
    Yang, Ru
    He, Junfei
    ENERGY SCIENCE AND APPLIED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, : 89 - 94