Dental patient reported outcome and oral health-related quality of life measures: protocol for a systematic evidence map of reviews

被引:10
作者
Beecher, Tara [1 ,2 ]
James, Patrice [1 ]
Browne, John [3 ]
Di Blasi, Zelda [2 ]
Harding, Mairead [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Whelton, Helen [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Oral Hlth Serv Res Ctr, Cork T12 E8YV, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Appl Psychol, Cork T23 TK30, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Publ Hlth, Cork T12 XF62, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Cork Univ, Dent Sch & Hosp, Cork T12 E8YV, Ireland
[5] St Finbarrs Hosp, Dent Clin, Hlth Serv Execut, Cork Kerry Community Healthcare Area, Cork T12 XH60, Ireland
[6] Univ Coll Cork, Coll Med & Hlth, Cork T12 EKD0, Ireland
关键词
ASSESSMENT TOOLS; SEARCHES; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41405-021-00065-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aims This research synthesis protocol addresses the question: what is the evidence concerning measurement properties of dental patient reported outcome measures (dPROMs), and regarding the real-world value of dPROMs, and where are the gaps in this evidence? Evidence mapping will systematically examine reviews of quantitative dPROMs used to assess the impact of oral health on the quality of life of dental patients and research participants. Evidence gaps where future research or systematic reviews are required will be identified. Materials and methods This protocol accords with the PRISMA-P guideline. Open Science Framework Registration . Biomedical and grey literature databases will be searched, adapting the same search strategy. Published or unpublished reviews evaluating any dPROM will be considered for inclusion. There will be no restriction by date, setting, or language. AMSTAR2 and ROBIS will evaluate risk of bias. Psychometric criteria will be adapted from COSMIN. Data will be summarised separately for specific populations and conditions. Discussion The findings will enable clinicians and researchers to identify methodologically robust dPROMs, appropriate for use with relevant populations and conditions. Implications for real-world practice and research will be discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Searching and synthesising 'grey literature' and 'grey information' in public health: Critical reflections on three case studies [J].
Adams J. ;
Hillier-Brown F.C. ;
Moore H.J. ;
Lake A.A. ;
Araujo-Soares V. ;
White M. ;
Summerbell C. .
Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Systematic reviews. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
[3]   PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts [J].
Beller, Elaine M. ;
Glasziou, Paul P. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Hopewell, Sally ;
Bastian, Hilda ;
Chalmers, Iain ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Lasserson, Toby ;
Tovey, David .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (04)
[4]   Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study [J].
Bramer, Wichor M. ;
Rethlefsen, Melissa L. ;
Kleijnen, Jos ;
Franco, Oscar H. .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
[5]  
Buchberger Barbara, 2016, Ger Med Sci, V14, pDoc09, DOI 10.3205/000236
[6]   Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials The CONSORT PRO Extension [J].
Calvert, Melanie ;
Blazeby, Jane ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Revicki, Dennis A. ;
Moher, David ;
Brundage, Michael D. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (08) :814-822
[7]   Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews [J].
Campbell, Mhairi ;
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ;
Sowden, Amanda ;
Thomson, Hilary .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 105 :1-9
[8]  
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2018, GREY MATTERS PRACTIC
[10]   Are dental researchers asking patient-important questions? A scoping review [J].
Fleming, Padhraig S. ;
Koletsi, Despina ;
O'Brien, Kevin ;
Tsichlaki, Aliki ;
Pandis, Nikolaos .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 49 :9-13