Female tungara frogs vary in commitment to mate choice

被引:28
作者
Baugh, Alexander T. [1 ,2 ]
Ryan, Michael J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Sect Integrat Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Inst Neurosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Balboa Ancon, Panama
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
body condition; choosiness; dynamic behavior; individual differences; mate choice; phonotaxis; MATING PREFERENCES; SEXUAL SELECTION; BODY CONDITION; PHYSALAEMUS-PUSTULOSUS; ADVERTISEMENT CALLS; SIZE; RESIDUALS; PREDATION;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/arp120
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Mate choice studies most often examine female preferences based on population responses, thus potentially overlooking individual differences in behavior. Moreover, such studies typically use invariant stimulus conditions to infer preferences. By using population responses and static stimulus presentations, it is difficult to thoroughly understand the complexity of the mate choice process, including variation present between individuals. Here, we investigated phonotactic mate choice behavior in female tungara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus) in response to temporally dynamic presentations of male advertisement calls. We tested females on repeated trials to examine individual differences and found considerable variation in the extent to which females update their mate choice decisions. Females in our study were bimodally distributed and thus broadly classified as either committed or uncommitted to an initial mate approach. We compared body condition measures of females differing behaviorally and determined that females with larger residual body masses were more committed to initial mate choices than less massive individuals, despite the fact that all females were in reproductive condition and field collected in amplexus. Our results suggest that anuran phonotaxis, once considered to be a highly stereotyped behavior, is more complex and variable than previously thought.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Male Position Relative to Foam Nests Influences Female Mate Choice in the Tungara Frog, Physalaemus pustulosus
    Martin, Christina
    Guy, Lisa
    Taylor, Ryan C.
    JOURNAL OF HERPETOLOGY, 2011, 45 (02) : 178 - 180
  • [22] Visual mate choice in poison frogs
    Summers, K
    Symula, R
    Clough, M
    Cronin, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 266 (1434) : 2141 - 2145
  • [23] Effects of information load on response times in frogs and bats: mate choice vs. prey choice
    Hemingway, Claire T.
    Lea, Amanda M.
    Page, Rachel A.
    Ryan, Michael J.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (08)
  • [24] Rational mate choice decisions vary with female age and multidimensional male signals in swordtails
    Reding, Luke
    Cummings, Molly E.
    ETHOLOGY, 2018, 124 (09) : 641 - 649
  • [25] The description of mate choice
    Edward, Dominic A.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 26 (02) : 301 - 310
  • [26] Sex differences in response to nonconspecific advertisement calls: receiver permissiveness in male and female tungara frogs
    Bernal, Ximena E.
    Rand, A. Stanley
    Ryan, Michael J.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2007, 73 : 955 - 964
  • [27] Concordance in mate choice in female mound-building mice
    Beigneux, Emilie
    Feron, Christophe
    Gouat, Patrick
    COMPTES RENDUS BIOLOGIES, 2012, 335 (03) : 220 - 225
  • [28] Sensory exploitation and plasticity in female mate choice in the swordtail characin
    Amcoff, Mirjam
    Lindqvist, Charlotte
    Kolm, Niclas
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 85 (05) : 891 - 898
  • [29] The Sounds of Silence as an Alarm Cue in Tungara Frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus
    Dapper, Amy L.
    Baugh, Alexander T.
    Ryan, Michael J.
    BIOTROPICA, 2011, 43 (03) : 380 - 385
  • [30] Female and male behavioral response to advertisement calls of graded complexity in tungara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus
    Bernal, Ximena E.
    Akre, Karin L.
    Baugh, Alexander T.
    Rand, A. Stanley
    Ryan, Michael J.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2009, 63 (09) : 1269 - 1279