An Investigation of the Factors Affecting Institutional Performance: Evidence from Higher Education Institutions

被引:0
作者
Khan, Irfan Ullah [1 ]
Idris, Muhammad [2 ]
Khan, Aman Ullah [1 ]
机构
[1] Gomal Univ, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
[2] Abdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan
来源
FWU JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2020年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
factors; (academic; economic; political); institutional performance; HEIs; SUSTAINABILITY; UNIVERSITIES; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; LEADERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The performance of institutions is squarely anchored with different factors that affect the institutional credibility and success either positively or negatively. The best performance on the part of institutions is the most dynamic issue for the institutions in attaining the desired objectives, ranking, and success. Still, there exists a dynamism that facilitates as well as interrupt the performance of the institutions in which academic, economic, and political aspects are the foremost. These factors are responsible either for the success or failure of higher education institutions in developing countries like Pakistan. In this connection, the present study confirms and validate the existence of the relationship between certain dynamic factors and institutional performance by collecting primary data over questionnaire from respondents hailing from higher education institutions of KP, Pakistan. A total of 325 respondents were selected from the entire population over simple random sampling techniques wherein each member of subset has an equal probability of being selection. Data were analyzed through statistical procedures (i.e., correlation and regression) to examine the hypotheses as developed from the theoretical framework. The results are valuable by providing significant information about the relationship (association, cause and effect) among the research variables and recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 140
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Sustainability reporting and performance management in universities Challenges and benefits [J].
Adams, Carol A. .
SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2013, 4 (03) :384-392
[2]   Assessment tools' indicators for sustainability in universities: an analytical overview [J].
Alghamdi, Naif ;
den Heijer, Alexandra ;
de Jonge, Hans .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 18 (01) :84-115
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, RES DEV SERIES
[4]   INVITED COMMENTARY 2 Challenges and visions for higher education in a complex world: commentary on Barnett and Barrie [J].
Austin, Ann E. .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 31 (01) :57-64
[5]  
Baldwin J., 2009, Perspectives, V13, P93, DOI 10.1080/13603100903292524
[6]   The comprehensiveness of competing higher education sustainability assessments [J].
Bullock, Graham ;
Wilder, Nicholas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 17 (03) :282-304
[7]  
Chaudhry A. R., 2009, J COMMERCE SOCIAL SC, V3, P137
[8]  
Creswell J., 2011, DESIGNING CONDUCTING, V2nd
[9]  
Devi L., 2017, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Studies, V3, P300
[10]   The Effect of Organizational Justice on Contextual Performance, Counterproductive Work Behaviors, and Task Performance: Investigating the moderating role of ability-based emotional intelligence [J].
Devonish, Dwayne ;
Greenidge, Dion .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 18 (01) :75-86