Does fluoroscopy prevent inadvertent parathyroidectomy in thyroid surgery?

INTRODUCTION Near-infrared imaging may facilitate intraoperative identification of parathyroid glands by causing autofluorescence but its clinical value has not been established. Inadvertent parathyroidectomy occurs in 5-22% of thyroidectomies and is associated with temporary and permanent hypoparathyroidism. MATERIALS AND METHODS The aim of this study was to determine whether near-infrared imaging prevents inadvertent parathyroidectomy and early hypocalcaemia as a surrogate for permanent hypoparathyroidism. Near-infrared imaging was used in a prospective cohort of consecutive thyroidectomies. Thyroidectomies performed prior to the introduction of near-infrared imaging formed a control group. The thyroid bed and specimen were scanned with near-infrared imaging. Areas of autofluorescence on the specimen were examined and any parathyroid tissue found was autotransplanted. Inadvertent parathyroidectomy was therefore recorded as established intraoperatively by near-infrared imaging (allowing autotransplantation) or on subsequent histology (missed). Serum calcium and parathyroid hormone were measured on day one and at two weeks and six months postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 269 patients were included: 106 near-infrared imaging and 163 controls. Inadvertent parathyroidectomy was detected by near-infrared imaging in two (and autotransplantation performed) and histologically (i.e. missed by near-infrared imaging in 13, 12.3% vs 17, 10.4% controls). Neither result was statistically significant (P = 0.08, 0.89). There was no significant difference in serum calcium or parathyroid hormone between near-infrared imaging and control groups at one day, two weeks or thereafter. DISCUSSION Near-infrared imaging may detect inadvertent parathyroidectomy and may allow autotransplantation. It did not, however, reduce the incidence of missed inadvertent parathyroidectomy and no difference was seen in early hypocalcaemia or late hypoparathyroidism. Current near-infrared imaging technology does not appear to confer a clinical benefit sufficient to justify its use.