Predictive value of linear-quadratic model in the treatment of cervical cancer using high-dose-rate brachytherapy

被引:17
|
作者
Sood, B
Garg, M
Avadhani, J
Gorla, G
Malhotra, H
Guha, C
Deore, S
Vikram, B
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2002年 / 54卷 / 05期
关键词
cervical cancer; radiation therapy; linear-quadratic model; biological equivalent dose;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03051-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether a dose-response relationship exists between the biologic effective dose (BED) at Point A and the bladder and rectum and the clinical outcomes in our experience with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical carcinoma. Methods and Materials: This was a retrospective study. A total of 49 patients with cervical cancer were treated with a combination of EBRT (median 45 Gy, range 41.4-50.4) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (median 18 Gy; range 18-19, in two fractions). Twenty-three patients received concomitant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The cumulative BEDS were calculated at Point A (BED10) and at bladder and rectal reference points (BED3) using the linear-quadratic equation. The BED10 values, after incorporating a time factor (BED10tf) in the formula, were also calculated. Results: In patients treated with RT alone, the local failure rate was 10% (1 of 10) and 19% (3 of 16) in patients receiving a BED10 >89 Gy10 or <89 Gy10 to Point A, respectively (p = 0.2). The corresponding local failure rates were 20% (3 of 15) and 0% (0 of 8) in patients treated with concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.3). In patients treated with RT alone, the local failure rate was 7.7% (1 of 13) and 23% (3 of 13) in patients with a BED10tf >64 Gy10 or <64 Gy10 (p = 0.1), respectively. The median BED3 values at the rectal and bladder point was 95.5 Gy3 and 103.6 Gy3, respectively. Only 1 case of Grade 2 late rectal toxicity (2%) and no late bladder toxicity occurred. Conclusion: In patients treated with RT alone, a BED10 >89 Gy and a BED10tf >64 Gy indicated a trend toward a better local control rate. This difference was not observed in patients receiving chemotherapy. A BED3 <100 Gy3 was associated with negligible late toxicity. Although the BED10 in our study was about 10-15 Gy10 less than that in the published data, the 4-year local control rate of 80% and 83% and disease-free survival rate of 75% and 70% with and without chemotherapy, respectively, compare well with the rates in other studies in the literature. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / 1387
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: Analysis of tumor recurrence - The University of Wisconsin experience
    Petereit, DG
    Sarkaria, JN
    Potter, DM
    Schink, JC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (05): : 1267 - 1274
  • [32] Indian Brachytherapy Society Guidelines for radiotherapeutic management of cervical cancer with special emphasis on high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Gudi, Shivakumar
    Singh, Roshni
    Sasidharan, Ajay
    Sastri, Supriya
    Gurram, Lavanya
    Sharma, Dayanand
    Ganeshrajah, Selvaluxmy
    Janaki, M. G.
    Badakh, Dinesh
    Basu, Abhishek
    James, Francis
    Swamidas, Jamema, V
    Kuppuswamy, Thayalan
    Bhalavat, Rajendra
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (04) : 293 - 306
  • [33] CORRELATION OF POINT B AND LYMPH NODE DOSE IN 3D-PLANNED HIGH-DOSE-RATE CERVICAL CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY
    Lee, Larissa J.
    Sadow, Cheryl A.
    Russell, Anthony
    Viswanathan, Akila N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : 803 - 809
  • [34] High-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of skin Kaposi sarcoma
    Gonzalez Ruiz, Maria Angeles
    Quiros Rivero, Juan
    Munoz Garcia, Julia Luisa
    Cabrera Rodriguez, Joaquin Jose
    Rios Kavadoy, Yesika
    Ropero Carmona, Maria Francisca
    Corbacho Campos, Almudena
    Garcia Urra, Fernando
    Cruz Munoz, Maria Cristina
    Ruiz Herrero, Amanda
    Almendral Manzano, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 9 (06) : 561 - 565
  • [35] High-dose-rate brachytherapy with surface applicator in penile cancer
    Saldi, Simonetta
    Zucchetti, Claudio
    Fulcheri, Christian Paolo Luca
    Saccia, Stefano
    Ali, Emanuele
    Marani, Simona
    Ingrosso, Gianluca
    Aristei, Cynthia
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (04) : 835 - 841
  • [36] EVALUATION OF RECTAL DOSE DURING HIGH-DOSE-RATE INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CARCINOMA
    Sha, Rajib Lochan
    Reddy, Palreddy Yadagiri
    Rao, Ramakrishna
    Muralidhar, Kanaparthy R.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2011, 36 (04) : 377 - 382
  • [37] RADIOTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL-CANCER WITH HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY - CORRELATION BETWEEN TUMOR SIZE, DOSE AND FAILURE
    ITO, H
    KUTUKI, S
    NISHIGUCHI, I
    SHIGEMATSU, N
    KURIBAYASHI, T
    UEMATSU, M
    NAKAYAMA, T
    KA, WJ
    TAKEMASA, K
    ANDO, Y
    KUBO, A
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 31 (03) : 240 - 247
  • [38] High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as an Organ-Sparing Treatment for Early Penile Cancer
    Pohankova, Denisa
    Sirak, Igor
    Vosmik, Milan
    Kasaova, Linda
    Grepl, Jakub
    Paluska, Petr
    Holub, Lukas
    Spacek, Jiri
    Hodek, Miroslav
    Kopecek, Martin
    Petera, Jiri
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [39] Workflow and efficiency in MRI-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer in a high-volume brachytherapy center
    Kim, Hayeon
    Houser, Christopher J.
    Kalash, Ronny
    Maceil, Carly A.
    Palestra, Brett
    Malush, Deborah
    Beriwal, Sushil
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 17 (05) : 753 - 760
  • [40] Reporting small bowel dose in cervix cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Liao, Yixiang
    Dandekar, Virag
    Chu, James C. H.
    Turian, Julius
    Bernard, Damian
    Kiel, Krystyna
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2016, 41 (01) : 28 - 33