Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: expertise-based randomized clinical trial of heavyweigh or lightweight mesh

被引:6
作者
Rutegard, M. [1 ,2 ]
Lindqvist, M. [1 ]
Svensson, J. [1 ,3 ]
Nordin, P. [4 ]
Haapamaki, M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Surg, SE-90185 Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Wallenberg Ctr Mol Med, Umea, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Umea Sch Business Econ & Stat, Dept Stat, Umea, Sweden
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Ostersund Res Unit, Surg, Ostersund, Sweden
关键词
POLYPROPYLENE MESH; SOCIETY GUIDELINES; LICHTENSTEIN; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1093/bjs/znaa049
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a shortage of high-quality studies regarding choice of mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair in relation to long-term chronic pain. The authors hypothesized that heavyweight compared with lightweight mesh causes increased postoperative pain. Methods: An RCT was undertaken between 2007 and 2009 at two sites in Sweden. Men aged 25 years or older with an inguinal hernia evaluated in the outpatient clinic were randomized in an unblinded fashion to heavyweight or lightweight mesh for open anterior inguinal hernia repair. Data on pain affecting daily activities, as measured by the Short-Form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire 9-12 years after surgery, were collected as the primary outcome. Differences between groups were evaluated by generalized odds and numbers needed to treat. Results: A total of 412 patients were randomized; 363 were analysed with 320 questionnaires sent out. A total of 271 questionnaires (84.7 per cent) were returned; of these, 121 and 150 patients were in the heavyweight and lightweight mesh groups respectively. Pain affecting daily activities was more pronounced in patients randomized to heavyweight versus lightweight mesh (generalized odds 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 1.61). This translated into a number needed to treat of 7.06 (95 per cent c.i. 4.28 to 21.44). Two reoperations for recurrence were noted in the heavyweight mesh group, and one in the lightweight mesh group. Conclusion: A large-pore lightweight mesh causes significantly less pain affecting daily activities a decade after open anterior inguinal hernia repair.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 144
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Persistent foreign body reaction around inguinal mesh prostheses: A potential pitfall of FDG PET
    Aide, N
    Deux, JF
    Peretti, I
    Mabille, L
    Mandet, J
    Callard, P
    Talbot, JN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 1172 - 1177
  • [2] Amid PK, 1996, EUR J SURG, V162, P447
  • [3] Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: A nationwide questionnaire study
    Bay-Nielsen, M
    Perkins, FM
    Kehlet, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 233 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [4] Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene mesh with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty
    Bury, K.
    Smietanski, M.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2012, 16 (05) : 549 - 553
  • [5] Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair
    Callesen, T
    Bech, K
    Kehlet, H
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (12) : 1528 - 1531
  • [6] An improved method for simple, assumption-free ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale using generalized odds ratios
    Churilov, Leonid
    Arnup, Sarah
    Johns, Hayden
    Leung, Tiffany
    Roberts, Stuart
    Campbell, Bruce C. V.
    Davis, Stephen M.
    Donnan, Geoffrey A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2014, 9 (08) : 999 - 1005
  • [7] Dabbas Natalie, 2011, JRSM Short Rep, V2, P5, DOI 10.1258/shorts.2010.010071
  • [8] Standard polypropylene mesh vs lightweight mesh for Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia: A randomized controlled trial
    Demetrashvili, Zaza
    Khutsishvili, Kakhi
    Pipia, Irakli
    Kenchadze, Giorgi
    Ekaladze, Eka
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 (12) : 1380 - 1384
  • [9] Grant AM, 2002, ANN SURG, V235, P322
  • [10] Inguinodynia following Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair: A review
    Hakeem, Abdul
    Shanmugam, Venkatesh
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (14) : 1791 - 1796