Temporary Health Impact of Prostate MRI and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Prostate Cancer Patients

被引:6
作者
Shankar, Prasad R. [1 ,2 ]
Maturen, Katherine E. [1 ]
George, Arvin K. [3 ]
Borza, Tudor [4 ]
Ellimoottil, Chandy [3 ]
Montgomery, Jeffrey S. [3 ]
Wei, John T. [3 ]
Denton, Brian T. [5 ]
Davenport, Matthew S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Michigan Med, Michigan Radiol Qual Collaborat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Michigan Med, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Urol, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Quality of life; patient-reported outcomes; prostate cancer; testing-related utilities; active surveillance; MEN; MORBIDITIES; STATES; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.031
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the temporary health impact of prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and transrectal prostate biopsy in an active surveillance prostate cancer population. Methods: A two-arm institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant prospective observational patient-reported outcomes study was performed from November 2017 to July 2018. Inclusion criteria were men with Gleason 6 prostate cancer in active surveillance undergoing either prostate mpMRI or transrectal prostate biopsy. A survey instrument was constructed using validated metrics in consultation with the local patient- and family-centered care organization. Study subjects were recruited at the time of diagnostic testing and completed the instrument by phone 24 to 72 hours after testing. The primary outcome measure was summary-testing-related quality of life (summary utility score), derived from the testing morbidities index (TMI) (scale: 0 = death and 1 = perfect health). TMI is stratified into seven domains, with each domain scored from 1 (no health impact) to 5 (extreme health impact). Testing-related quality-of-life measures in the two cohorts were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Results: In all, 122 subjects were recruited, and 90% (110 of 122 [MRI 55 of 60, biopsy 55 of 62]) successfully completed the survey instrument. The temporary quality-of-life impact of transrectal biopsy was significantly greater than that of prostate mpMRI (0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.85, versus 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97; P <.001). The largest mean, domain-level difference was for intraprocedural pain (transrectal biopsy 2.6, 95% CI 2.4-2.8, versus mpMRI 1.3, 95% CI 1.14.5; P <.001). Conclusion: Transrectal prostate biopsy has greater temporary health impact (lower testing-related quality-of-life measure) than prostate mpMRI.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1392
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Elastography Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Patients under Active Surveillance
    Steinwender, Tobias
    Manka, Lukas
    Grindei, Mircea
    Tian, Zhe
    Winter, Alexander
    Gerullis, Holger
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Hammerer, Peter
    Schiffmann, Jonas
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2020, 104 (11-12) : 948 - 953
  • [32] Validating multiparametric MRI for diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer in patients for active surveillance
    Sahibzada, Iqbal
    Batura, Deepak
    Hellawell, Giles
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 48 (04) : 529 - 533
  • [33] The Relationship Between Prostate Specific Antigen Change and Biopsy Progression in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Whitson, Jared M.
    Porten, Sima P.
    Hilton, Joan F.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Perez, Nannette
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Simko, Jeff P.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (05) : 1656 - 1660
  • [34] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Herlemann, Annika
    Stief, Christian G.
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (02): : 269 - 278
  • [35] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: past, present and future
    Singer, Eric A.
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Turkbey, Baris
    Couvillon, Anna
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Parnes, Howard L.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [36] Quality of life in active surveillance for early prostate cancer
    Kato, Takuma
    Sugimoto, Mikio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (04) : 296 - 306
  • [37] Anxiety in the management of localised prostate cancer by active surveillance
    Anderson, Jake
    Burney, Susan
    Brooker, Joanne E.
    Ricciardelli, Lina A.
    Fletcher, Jane M.
    Satasivam, Prassannah
    Frydenberg, Mark
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 : 55 - 61
  • [38] The role of MRI in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer
    Recabal, Pedro
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2015, 25 (06) : 504 - 509
  • [39] Biparametric MRI in prostate cancer during active surveillance: is it safe?
    Caglic, Iztok
    Sushentsev, Nikita
    Syer, Tom
    Lee, Kang-Lung
    Barrett, Tristan
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (10) : 6217 - 6226
  • [40] Abbreviated Versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Active Surveillance for Prostate-Cancer Patients: Comparison of Accuracy and Clinical Utility as a Decisional Tool
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Maresca, Silvio
    Dal Moro, Fabrizio
    Bednarova, Iliana
    Randazzo, Gianmarco
    Basso, Giovanni
    Reitano, Giuseppe
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Zuiani, Chiara
    Girometti, Rossano
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (04)