'In vitro' binding of propofol to serum lipoproteins in thyroid dysfunction

被引:6
作者
de la Fuente, L
Lukas, JC
Vázquez, JA
Jauregizar, N
Calvo, R
Suárez, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Dept Pharmacol, Fac Med, Leioa 48940, Spain
[2] Cruces Hosp, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
关键词
propofol; protein binding; thyroid dysfunction; regression model;
D O I
10.1007/s00228-002-0520-z
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine a regression relationship between the unbound fraction (fu percent) of propofol, a highly lipophilic intravenous anaesthetic agent, and demographic and biochemical variables in a thyroid dysfunction population. Methods: Serum samples from patients with hypo (n=33) and hyperthyroidism (n=33) and also from healthy volunteers (control group; n=9) were spiked with propofol to a total (bound + unbound propofol) concentration of 10 mug/ml. The unbound concentration was determined using ultrafiltration followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection and the unbound fraction percent (fu) and the binding ratio [bound/free concentration (B/F)] were calculated. Albumin, alpha-acid glycoprotein, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, VLDL lipoproteins, and T3 and T4 hormone concentrations were measured. B/F has a linear relationship with lipoprotein concentration - unlike that for fu which is curvilinear - so, we developed a linear regression model of B/F for propofol with the above biochemical variables and with gender. Results: The fu in hypothyroidism was significantly lower than in the healthy control (mean standard deviation 0.74 +/- 0.13% vs 0.87 +/- 10.12%, P<0.01) but the fu was no different in hyperthyroid subjects than controls (0.94 +/- 0.16% vs 0.87 +/- 0.12%, P > 0.05). HDL, LDL and VLDL lipoproteins were significant predictors of B/F (P < 0.05) and were capable of explaining 54% of the variability in the 'in vitro' binding of propofol in thyroid disease. Conclusion: These results could help explain the interindividual variability in the protein binding of propofol in thyroid dysfunction patients and suggest the inclusion of lipoproteins in covariate model development for the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of propofol.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 619
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The determinants of propofol induction of anesthesia dose [J].
Adachi, YU ;
Watanabe, K ;
Higuchi, H ;
Satoh, T .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (03) :656-661
[2]   Validation of liquid chromatographic and gas chromatographic methods - Applications to pharmacokinetics [J].
Bressolle, F ;
BrometPetit, M ;
Audran, M .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 686 (01) :3-10
[3]  
CHAN K, 1990, METHOD FIND EXP CLIN, V12, P135
[4]   PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL SELECTION FOR TARGET CONTROLLED INFUSIONS OF PROPOFOL - ASSESSMENT OF 3 PARAMETER SETS [J].
COETZEE, JF ;
GLEN, JB ;
WIUM, CA ;
BOSHOFF, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) :1328-1345
[5]   Serum protein binding of propofol in patients with renal failure or hepatic cirrhosis [J].
Costela, JL ;
Jimenez, R ;
Calvo, R ;
Suarez, E ;
Carlos, R .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 40 (06) :741-745
[6]   PREDICTION OF FREE PHENYTOIN LEVELS BASED ON [TOTAL PHENYTOIN] [ALBUMIN] RATIOS - POTENTIAL ERRORS WITH HYPOALBUMINEMIA [J].
DASGUPTA, A ;
DENNEN, DA ;
DEAN, R ;
MCLAWHON, RW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1991, 95 (02) :253-256
[7]   ALTERED PLASMA-PROTEIN BINDING OF DRUGS IN THYROID-DISEASE [J].
FEELY, J ;
STEVENSON, IH ;
CROOKS, J .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1981, 6 (04) :298-305
[8]  
Garrido M J, 1994, Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, V41, P308
[9]   Pharmacokinetic concepts for TCI anaesthesia [J].
Gepts, E .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 :4-12
[10]   DERIVATION AND EVALUATION OF AN EQUATION FOR PREDICTION OF FREE PHENYTOIN CONCENTRATION IN PATIENTS CO-MEDICATED WITH VALPROIC ACID [J].
HAIDUKEWYCH, D ;
RODIN, EA ;
ZIELINSKI, JJ .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1989, 11 (02) :134-139