Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: Quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up

被引:93
作者
Stiggelbout, AM
deHaes, JCJM
Vree, R
vandeVelde, CJH
Bruijninckx, CMA
vanGroningen, K
Kievit, J
机构
[1] UNIV AMSTERDAM,ACAD MED CTR,DEPT MED PSYCHOL,NL-1105 AZ AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] DIACONESSEN HOSP,DEPT SURG,NL-2300 RD LEIDEN,NETHERLANDS
[3] UNIV LEIDEN HOSP,DEPT SURG,NL-2300 RC LEIDEN,NETHERLANDS
[4] LEYENBURG HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,NL-2504 LN THE HAGUE,NETHERLANDS
[5] LEYENBURG HOSP,DEPT SURG,NL-2504 LN THE HAGUE,NETHERLANDS
关键词
colorectal cancer; routine follow-up; quality of life; patient preferences;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1997.161
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aims of our study were to assess the effect of follow-up on the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients and to assess the attitudes of patients towards follow-up as a function of patient characteristics. Patients who had been treated with curative intent were selected from four types of hospitals. Eighty-two patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire, whereas 130 patients received the questionnaire by mail. To assess the effect of follow-up on the quality of life, the interviewed patients were randomly allocated to three groups and interviewed at different times in relation to the follow-up visit. Analysis did not show an effect of the follow-up visit on quality of life. Patients reported a positive attitude towards follow-up: it reassured them, they judged the communication with the physician to be positive, and they experienced only slight nervous anticipation and few other disadvantages. Patients reported a strong preference for follow-up, and a large majority would prefer follow-up even if it would not lead to earlier detection of a recurrence, Apart from living situation, no patient characteristics were clearly associated with the attitude towards follow-up. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 920
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   WHOSE UTILITIES FOR DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
BOYD, NF ;
SUTHERLAND, HJ ;
HEASMAN, KZ ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
CUMMINGS, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :58-67
[2]   IS THERE A NEED TO FOLLOW-UP CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
BRADA, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (05) :655-657
[3]  
BROYN T, 1982, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V148, P401
[4]   FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL-CANCER - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BRUINVELS, DJ ;
STIGGELBOUT, AM ;
KIEVIT, J ;
VANHOUWELINGEN, HC ;
HABBEMA, JDF ;
VANDEVELDE, CJH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 219 (02) :174-182
[5]  
BRUINVELS DJ, 1995, THESIS U LEIDEN LEID
[6]   INTERVIEWER VERSUS SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONNAIRES IN DEVELOPING A DISEASE-SPECIFIC, HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR ASTHMA [J].
COOK, DJ ;
GUYATT, GH ;
JUNIPER, E ;
GRIFFITH, L ;
MCILROY, W ;
WILLAN, A ;
JAESCHKE, R ;
EPSTEIN, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (06) :529-534
[7]   MEASURING PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL DISTRESS IN CANCER-PATIENTS - STRUCTURE AND APPLICATION OF THE ROTTERDAM-SYMPTOM-CHECKLIST [J].
DEHAES, JCJM ;
VANKNIPPENBERG, FCE ;
NEIJT, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 62 (06) :1034-1038
[8]   FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
DEVENEY, KE ;
WAY, LW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 148 (06) :717-722
[9]  
*GIVIO INV, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V271, P1587
[10]  
ISBISTER W H, 1988, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V17, P66